MINUTES OF MEETING TURTLE RUN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

A special  meeting of the  Board of Supervisors  of the Turtle  Run Community Development District was held on Monday, June 3, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. at the offices of
Governmental Management Services, 5385 N. Nob Hill Road, Sunrise, Florida 33351.

Present and constituting a quorum:
Chris Kapish Lance Morgan Skip Carney Zaida Karnegis John Pfeiffer

Chairman
Vice Chairman
Assistant Secretary (by phone) Assistant Secretary (by phone) Assistant Secretary

Also present were:

Dennis Baldis Michael Pawelczyk Bob Zuccaro Jonathan Geiger Tamara Peacock

District Manager District Counsel KCI Technologies KCI Technologies
Tamara Peacock Architects (by phone)

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Roll Call

Mr. Kapish called the meeting to order and Mr. Baldis called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS
A moment of silence was held.

Moment of Silence

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mr. Kapish led the pledge of allegiance.

Pledge of Allegiance

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mr. Kapish:  We will skip number four.

Good News

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Public Comment

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Mr. Kapish:  We have nobody here from the public so we will move onto #6.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESSS

Update

and	Discussion

of

Projects for the Bonds
Mr. Kapish:  I am sure Bob and Jonathan both have information.

Mr.   Zuccaro:

On  Friday  we	received   the	bids  for	Creekside	roadway

improvements.  Jonathan, do you just want to talk in general what happened?  We are in
the process of doing a bid tabulation and analyzing the bids.

Mr.  Geiger:	We  had five  contractors  submit.

Stanford Construction, Florida

I

Blacktop, Alonzo, Weekly Asphalt and H&R Paving who is the same contractors that submitted for Terrapin Lane. I do have the total cost for everything ranked by least expensive to most expensive. We are still working on the tabulation. I'll have that over to you tomorrow Dennis to distribute to the Board to talk about at the next meeting.
Mr. Baldis: Ok.
Mr. Kapish: Florida Blacktop is the one that is doing the Terrapin Lane right? Mr. Geiger: Correct.  Just take a quick look at it.  Stanford is the low bidder and
H&R Paving if you take a look at their packet, they didn't use the revised bid form so obviously that cost should be higher. I don't know if that is relevant because they are way up there.
Mr. Kapish: Really the first four bids are pretty close.
Mr. Geiger: Everyone came in more competitive this time it looks like especially the ones that were way over everyone else on the last one.
Mr. Kapish: So you will have that for us next meeting that spreadsheet?
Mr. Geiger: Yes I will have the spreadsheet.	I will send everything over to Dennis tomorrow so he can send it out.
Mr. Baldis:  We can get a small project agreement ready for that or not?  Do we have to wait?
Mr. Pawelczyk: No we will have the agreement ready to go. Mr. Baldis: Ok.
Mr. Pawelczyk:  We can always fill in the name of the contractor.  That is pretty
easy.

2

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Mr. Geiger: Terrapin Lane contractor said the building permit as well as the signed agreement and all that, they should have stuff into Coral Springs. Unfortunately they are still waiting for Broward County Traffic engineering approval on the pavement marking and striping. They are not going to get the building permit and their engineering permit until that is approved. That is about a month timeframe from what Sharon told me and said is that about two weeks. They still have two weeks to get back to us. I am going to contact her this week to see if there has been any progress and if they can send it out.
Mr. Kapish: This is the approval for the striping on Terrapin? Mr. Geiger: The striping and signage yes.
Mr. Kapish: Isn't that pretty standard?
Mr. Geiger: Yes. I am going to reach out this week and see if any progress has been made.  Same with Creekside.  They are still reviewing Creekside.  As soon as we
get those hopefully we get Creekside pretty soon.  Creekside, we received the bids so all

we are waiting on now is for the Board to make a selection.

Moving onto the flagpoles

we have everything ready to go pretty much for submittal of the building permit minus the engineering drawings from the flagpole company.   I do have Stanford's revised proposal I was going to talk about that.
Mr. Baldis: We need to get a small project agreement going with that. So we need to talk about it.
Mr. Geiger: Stanford finally got us the revised proposal for the flagpole project. This is for the flagpoles on Turtle Creek Drive and on Sample Road. His pricing also includes switches at the three lights at the existing flagpole on Turtle Run Boulevard an Sample.
Mr. Kapish: This quote is $55,915?
Mr. Geiger: This doesn't include the installation of the flagpole. This is just for the electric and the demolition.
Mr. Kapish: Demolition of what?
Mr. Geiger: They have to take out topsoil.
Mr. Kapish: Seems like a lot of money to me. You are talking about a company that is excavating.  Is that how they did pouring cement?

3

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

Mr. Baldis: That is not in the installation

of the poles.  That is another $19,000 on

top of this.   This is just for Stanford to prep the area, to get the electric there and to have
the brick pavers put in.  That pole would be another contract with A-Flag and put that in

and his price was $19,000 for the three poles installed.

It will probably be a little less

because Keith & Schnars is providing the engineering plans.
Mr. Kapish:  This doesn't even pay for the pavers that you are putting around the flagpoles right?
Mr. Geiger: This includes pavers and concrete. This includes everything minus the flagpole installation and the poles themselves. The electric is the bulk of the work. That includes the switch out in the fixtures for the other flagpole locations, the three lights that are getting switched.  I think the fixtures themselves are pretty expensive.
Mr. Baldis:  So it is six lights so it is two jobs.	It is doing the lights at Turtle Run Boulevard and Sample and putting the lights in here.   That is the bulk of the $32,000.
Mr. Kapish: This is doing both locations Mr. Baldis:  For the lighting.
Mr. Kapish: But if you change the pavers up at in the main entrance, those pavers, we might be ripping those pavers out and redoing those pavers.
Mr. Baldis: We haven't discussed that.
Mr. Kapish: Right but what I am saying is this whole thing is I just think that you have to have another vendor take a look at it and give us a price.
Mr. Pfeiffer: I agree.
Mr. Kapish: Even if this price was for both places, the same exact work it would still be high.
Mr. Pfeiffer: It is for one location right? Mr. Zuccaro: Lighting at two.
Mr. Baldis:  The construction of one.
Mr. Kapish: If this included construction of two that would still be something to think
about.
Mr. Baldis: My question is the electric as far as hooking it up, how much are the fixtures is what Iwould like to know. That will tell you a lot. We are connecting the electric

4

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

to the existing streetlighting so that pole is right there.  I don't know what else that entails other than running a wire there.
Mr. Geiger: I think the fixtures are like $6,000 or $7,000 apiece. Mr. Baldis: Ithink that is what we need to know.
Mr. Kapish: Are they LED? Mr. Baldis: Yes.
Mr. Kapish: What do they look like?
Mr. Baldis: That is what we need to identify.  The cost of the fixtures and what is the appearance of them.  If they are $6,000 apiece, that is a pretty expensive light fixture.

Mr. Geiger:

As far as appearance, our sub-contractor said they looked at the

existing lights and they specked out something that is going to match.
Mr. Baldis: It doesn't have to match because we are switching them out. Mr. Zuccaro:  It is upward lighting, how fancy can it be?
Mr. Baldis: I know these fixtures are expensive because they are well lights but
$6,000.
Mr. Kapish: Well $6,000 times three poles that is $18,000 just in the three lights. That is a lot of money. The electric is $32,000 so I don't know. I would like to be able to understand that part of this proposal.
Mr. Zuccaro: We will get back with them and get some more detail on this.  Maybe
get another bid from another contractor.  This is specialty work, it is hard to get guys to
I

do small jobs like this.
Mr. Kapish: What I would like to see is Stanford do work on that paver sidewalk over there on Turtle Creek.
Mr. Geiger: Speaking on that. As far as the Turtle Creek path goes over there. Survey has been out in the field updating the surveys for me. The field work on that is 90% complete, they just have to do just do a couple more checks. As soon as they get the survey and that should be finalized hopefully within the next week. From there we just have to submit to DRC basically for approval.
Mr. Baldis:  What is taking the surveying so long? We cleared that area out two
months ago.

5

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Mr. Geiger: They were waiting on the O&E report.	It had to be dated within 30

days so if they went and did survey stuff and didn't get the O&E.

They are trying to time

it so that I don't get a report and survey and then it is not ready to go and they need to update it again. They have been out all last week doing a couple things for us. That will be ready to go soon hopefully. As long as there is no comments and we get the DRC approval it is just a matter of getting plans over to the city after that.
Mr. Kapish: Ok.
Mr. Geiger: We have the Turtle Run sign post replacement plans going to the city commission on Wednesday. Hopefully that just gets approved and there is not an issue with those. Once they get approved by the city I can submit to Broward County Traffic engineering for their approval. They refuse to look at the plans until the license agreement is approved.
Mr. Baldis: How long will it take them to look at it?
Mr. Geiger: Hopefully two weeks. They have seen the signage a couple times already.
Mr. Kapish: Ithought there was a, isn't there this month when the city commission meetings were approving some license agreements.
Mr. Baldis: That is the one. They have to approve it before Broward will look at it.
Mr. Geiger: Broward County needs a letter from the city engineer or something of that nature.  City engineer won't write a letter about something that is going to go to city

commission approval.
Mr. Zuccaro: I have Tamara here.
Mr. Baldis: She is part of the projects.  The Estate sign. Mr. Zuccaro: Can we jump to the Estate sign?
Ms. Peacock: Do you want to talk about the electrical proposal that was submitted for the additional work?
Mr. Zuccaro: Yes, if you could share with the Board here what you found out.
Ms. Peacock: Ok so we had forwarded it to the electrical engineer and he had a few comments. He thought that we should request a breakdown because he thought that the cost of the transformer looked like it was high relative to his understanding of what
they cost.  He also said to look at his drawings for the notes that he had about doing the

f

6

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

wiring because there was some wiring included in his drawing and he thought that we should get a credit for the wiring that was part of the base bid. Then he also cautioned us, he said it would be better to wait to approve as a final when we actually have the permit from Coral Springs with the amended work on it because they might have additional comments when we go into the building department. Cristin checked and that revision that was issued did not go into the building department yet. Those were his concerns but I think that in conclusion there is added value, there is additional scope to what he did, his base bid and that it is a legitimate request for extra work. I think at the point that we clarify that it should get approved so he can move forward.
Mr. Baldis:  What is the dollar amount we would need to have a change order to do that?
Ms. Peacock: Well I think it will be under $5,000.
Mr. Baldis: We need to know the exact amount and we have to have a change order with the description.
Mr. Zuccaro: His change order that he was requesting is how much?
Ms. Peacock: It was about $5,000.  If he gives us a breakdown it will be under
$5,000.
Mr. Zuccaro:  $4,858.08 Jonathan? Mr. Geiger: Yes.
Mr. Zuccaro: So you are going to request a more detailed breakdown?
Ms. Peacock: Yes, for the cost of the transformer and also to show that the credit was given for the wiring that was in the base bid.
Mr. Baldis:  We will need that for the next meeting. Ms. Peacock: Yes.
Mr. Pawelczyk: It has to be given to GMS before the 17th.
Ms. Peacock: We said this to him today.  We were hoping that he might turn it right around but he wasn't able to.
Mr. Kapish: So, if you don't have this electrical. Mr. Baldis: It won't be lit.
Mr. Kapish:  How do you know if it works?
Mr. Baldis: Right.

7

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

Mr. Kapish: Then they will have to come back and if it doesn't work they will have to come back.
Mr. Baldis: Exactly.
Mr. Kapish: I don't understand any of this.
Mr. Baldis: That is what we went over in a prior meeting, they evidentially didn't look at the plan until they got out there and that is when all this happened. Bob is that accurate?
Mr. Zuccaro: I assume yes.
Mr. Kapish: The electric company?
Mr. Baldis: The contractor, he showed up and he was well, where is this and where it that. Remember we spoke about the pre-construction meeting where they didn't even want to come.  This is where that lead us.
Mr. Kapish: Will they still come out there and put the letters on even though they don't work?
Ms. Peacock:  Yeah that is part of what they are under contract to do. Mr. Kapish:  How long does it take to put all those up a day?
Ms. Peacock: Yes probably a day.  That is just the attachments of each letter. Mr. Kapish: Ok.  Do you have anything else?
Mr. Zuccaro: Is that Tamara?
Ms. Peacock: That is it. There is no other issues, we will eventually need to get this processed so we can get him finished up out there.
Mr. Kapish: Where are we at with the main entrance? Mr. Zuccaro: The status of the overall construction.
Ms. Peacock:  Ithink we are just waiting on those letters to go on. Mr. Baldis: We are talking about the main entrance.
Ms. Peacock: Oh we are switching to the main entrance.
\
Mr. Baldis: He was going to pick up the permit on the 27th is what I have. Mr. Geiger: We have a pre-construction meeting on Wednesday.
Mr. Baldis: It is scheduled for the 5th.

8

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Mr. Kapish: What is going to happen just so we are all clear at the table here? What is going to happen is on June 5th you are going to have your pre-construction meeting.  We are going to have that and then what is going to happen?
Mr. Zuccaro: Then they are going to start.
Mr. Pawelczyk: I think they are required to present a schedule aren't they under the contract?
Mr. Zuccaro: Yes.
Ms. Peacock: I know when I spoke With John at Ansco he said that he wants to start by June 15th. That is why we scheduled the meeting for the 5th.
Mr. Baldis: We will talk to him on Wednesday. Mr. Kapish: Ok.
Ms. Peacock: We should be getting that one going then.
Mr. Zuccaro: Alright Tamara. If you can get that from the electrical guy tomorrow that would be good.
Ms. Peacock: The revised proposal so we can process the change order. Ok. We will do that.
Mr. Zuccaro: Ok.  Bye.
Mr. Geiger: I think Bob spoke about the Forest Glen wall earlier.
Mr. Zuccaro: We got a letter way back in December. It was a rejection letter from the School Board. It was written to Chris and the last meeting we were discussing to kind of hold up. There is a gentleman named Sean Cerra who Chris has had a meeting with that is going to be with the School Board or used to be with them.
Mr. Kapish: He still works for them.
Mr. Zuccaro: He is supposed to try from the inside find out what is going on and then maybe report back to us in a couple of weeks.
Mr. Kapish: I think that letter that you got from the School Board, the email or whatever you got from this new guy talking about anything new, Ithink what you need to do is preempt that with a letter or email to them about staking out because on that letter he has things that has nothing to do with what we are building.  He talks about the police
can't see and all that stuff and that has nothing, if they want something  new that is

9

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

something that is not a part of that project.  It is part of a project that was proposed on Wiles Road, not part of this project.
Mr. Zuccaro: I crafted a letter back on December 1oth as response to this. It is a draft that I have had and what we are doing is we are adding some graphics and stuff to that that we can submit to them and address those issues.
Mr. Geiger: I put a whole package together with pretty much everything we submitted with every response we got, it is very easy for this new person to go through it and understand where we were and where we are now. Like you said they did make comments on things that really didn't seem relevant to this wall. All their plans :have the wall on Wiles as well.
Mr. Kapish: Really for us to have a legitimate meeting I think they need to be on the table at least in the same book that we are on.  They are confusing themselves.
Mr. Zuccaro: We can make that submittal. If you can get me this guy's email we can make sure he gets a copy of it.
Mr. Geiger: As far as some of the other sound barrier walls that we have been working on, we have submitted FPL consent agreement for the lots 55 & 56 wall Chris. There is a four week turn around on that. They got the package on the 29th of May so give it about another week or two. See if we can reach out and see where it is on that. Other than that until we get the approval they are not going to get the O&E report. It has to be dated within 30 days. They are going to look to do the survey field work on that last since they have some other things to take care of in Turtle Run. On the lots 1-4 wall we are just waiting on an executed agreement or executed easements. Once I get those it will just be a matter of ordering the O&E report and doing the updated survey but I kind of want to wait until we get these easements signed off on so my O&E report is not over 30 days when I submit it.
Mr. Baldis: Just a quick note there, we do have three of them now. Mr. Costa has agreed and signed the easement. So we have Mr. Costa, the Carlson's, and Irma's, we just have Ms. Brown. She has requested two checks to her bank so they will review what we are requesting. Chris is going to drop those off at her house. He has them with him
tonight.  If you are going to talk about the other walls, I can tell you that we have all these
i
homes here, we have Ms. Stefanik has signed it, Perry has signed it, the rental home IH

10

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

2 has signed it. I got an email Montique they said they are in the process. So we are going to have all five of these homes plus I guess this gentleman on the FPL easement, the second home.  I haven't talked to him but is he?  Is he getting the wall too?
Mr. Kapish: No.
Mr. Baldis: We will have these five and these four shortly. Then we have this one over here.
Mr. Geiger: Now with that, are we keeping it as just lots 55 and 56 because I didn't revise plans based on us only having the two easements signed. If it is going to be additional lots, I will have to revise the plans and they are going to have to pull additional O&E reports as well.  I kind of need to know that sooner than later.
Mr. Kapish: That is for this 55 & 56?
Mr. Geiger: Yes. Right now the plans are just for 55 & 56 with an end treatment without columns so that we can expand the wall. That was the thought at the time.
Mr. Kapish: I think this guy actually called me up last week and he wanted to know what was going on because this thing has been taking months. To be honest with you at this point, I would just have this wall and turn it in. If it is on his property that is fine.
Mr. Zuccaro: We just submitted for the FPL agreement.
Mr. Kapish: I know but you said it is going to be four weeks. We are going to wait for that and then we are going to have to wait for it to go back to Coral Springs for DRC approval and then building permit. We are talking another two months away.
Mr. Geiger: The FPL approval if they get within four weeks, DRC is an 8 day turnaround according to the city and then building permits is just to depend if you get a contractor in there right away to submit everything for the building department, it shouldn't be that long.
Mr.  Kapish: At the end of the day we are talking about 90 days. Mr. Pfeiffer: Just for administrative stuff.
Mr. Kapish: In order for us to work on this why don't we just skip the FPL thing, do the wall on his property and just get it done. Skip the FPL. You could put the letter in and if it comes back soon or something but let's skip the next step and let's start doing
what we need to do.

11

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Mr. Geiger: You guys also just gave them a $500 non-refundable check to get the
consent.
Mr. Kapish: Ok.
Mr. Pfeiffer: I agree with Chris. Once we get all that done, how quickly can we proceed with actually constructing the wall typically?
Mr. Geiger: My original question still stands, am I stopping the wall at Lot 56 because now I'm hearing we are getting more easements that are getting signed.
Mr. Kapish: We are doing 55 & 56 at this point. Then we are also doing lots 1- 4 together and then that little wall across the street. We need to get 1, 2, 3, and 4 going. We need to get 55 & 56 going.
Mr. Pawelczyk: You should be able to do both at the same time.  Right? Mr. Geiger: As long as the easements all get signed and everything.
Mr. Kapish: Which project is closest?
Mr. Geiger: The one across from the school.  That is on your property.
Mr. Kapish: We are not going to build that by itself. Lots 1-4 we are just waiting on Ms. Brown.
Mr. Baldis: The other three are signed sitting in front of you right there. Mr. Geiger: The other one if you are not going to wait for FPL.
Mr. Kapish: It has been paid for and we are waiting but Idon't know if Iwant to wait a full four weeks. If they get back to you in a week great and then we can do that but to sit here and wait four weeks, it is dragging on too long.
Mr. Pfeiffer: You are waiting for FPL approval right? Which we know we will get it. Mr. Kapish: It is going to put the wall on the FPL easement, that little piece.
Mr. Pawelczyk: You really have been waiting for the owners to get the easements. Mr. Pfeiffer: That is true but this piece of it shouldn't be a problem.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Typically with FPL no, you just have to wait for them to get to it.
Mr. Geiger: They approved the other one. What we could try to do is Icould revise it to move it off the FPL easement, submit it to the city and let's say they get back to us in two or three weeks and the plans have been approved by the city, we can submit a revision and move the wall back on FPL. We just have to have that consent agreement.
Mr. Baldis: That sounds good.  Just do that.  That gets it going.

12

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Mr. Pawelczyk: On 55 & 56 what about 57, 58 and 59? Do you have those executed?  Is that included there?
Mr. Baldis: They are there.
Mr. Geiger: If we have executed agreements. It makes more sense just to run the rest of the wall down.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Just to cut this down because I just got these original easements today. Dennis and I talked about either Friday or this morning. We will give a list and distribute a list to the Board and to Jonathan as to which ones we have. We are going to record the ones we have as long as they are in a line. If there is a break we can wait until we can fix the break basically.
Mr. Kapish:  1, 2, 3 and 4 you are going to have all in a line. Mr. Pawelczyk: Correct.
Mr. Baldis: Right and you do those four plus the wall across the street. That would give you five walls going. By then Montinque should have theirs and there will be another five going the other way.
Mr. Pawelczyk: We will distribute what we have just so everybody is aware. Can I add just one thing on this Jonathan since it is on this matter. Dennis and I went back and we discussed these easements and wall easement pretty much ad nauseam over the last year and half. I don't know if we have an approval or a motion from the Board authorizing the District to enter into those particular easements so what we will do is-I am going to ask for a motion to authorize us to do so now. Then once they are recorded we will bring it back for a ratification so they cn get in the record. Unless there is any questions, I need a motion to authorize the execution and acceptance of the perpetual access and maintenance wall and landscaping easements for lot 1 through 4 and for lots 55 through
63 and 79. All of them are along Turtle Run Boulevard which we just discussed.

13

On MOTION by Mr. Morgan seconded by Mr. Pfeiffer with all in favor authorizing execution and acceptance of the perpetual access and maintenance wall and landscaping easements for lots 1 through 4 and lots 55 through 63 and also lot 79 was approved.

Turtle Run CDD

June 3, 2019

Mr. Geiger: The small little wall that is pretty much ready to go. Survey field work is completed. I am just waiting on the updated survey and finalized CAD file so we can double check grades. Surveyors went out and they have started doing survey on both the Harbor Island and the Newport communities around getting that wall. You guys were looking to maybe replace it. The wall is about four foot in height. There is a grade difference between the two sides of the site over there. This one is going to be a little trickier to design but we will have a survey to look at.
Mr. Kapish: Is the wall over the entire thing four foot high?
Mr. Geiger: I didn't have a tape on me when I was out there but it is a consistent height on the resident's side. The grade is just much higher on the roadway side. It looked about four feet from what I could tell.
Mr. Kapish: If we go forward with that my idea is that the communities need to put some skin in the game and maybe they need to pay for part of it such as the demolition of it. The wall does not have to be brick. The wall can be CBS block wall stucco with maybe the columns maybe being brick. It doesn't have to be exactly like all the other walls as long as it is consistent. Those are a couple of ideas. It may make the price a lot less. From what I understand the walls that have the brick on them, that is the bulk of the price of the wall is in that brick.  It is not is the CBS block or not in the stucco.
Mr. Zuccaro:  We are getting a survey right? Mr. Geiger: Yes.
Mr. Zuccaro: The concern I have is that they have this max height that you can go from the natural ground. If we go and demo that wall I think you thought it was only a two foot high wall but it might be a higher wall than that.
Mr. Kapish: It is four feet on the homeowner's side so which grade do you use? Mr. Geiger: Wherever the foundation is probably.
Mr. Baldis: What he is saying is you could end up with the six foot wall two feet higher than what you already have.
Mr. Kapish: I understand.
Mr. Zuccaro: Well the question is do you end up with it higher than what you have. Mr. Geiger: If you go out there and drive some places the grade is much higher.
Mr. Kapish: That is why we are exploring this.

14

Turtle Run CDD

June 3, 2019

Mr. Geiger: We will put together some concept plans and everything and you guys have something to bring to the HOA's over there and get some input.
Mr. Kapish: Alright.
Mr. Geiger: That is pretty much all I have.   Turtle Run Shoppes fence easement. Mr. Baldis: Where?
Mr. Geiger: It is getting reviewed but I was told they had to split them into five separate easements. It was redlined and it should be done this week.
Mr. Baldis: Awesome.
Mr. Geiger: I haven't personally heard from Rohl but they were supposed to be starting soon.
Mr. Baldis: They will be starting in July.
Mr. Kapish: I think I sent that email to you Bob, did you get it?
Mr. Zuccaro: This is my personal phone.  You sent it to my work email.  The KCI email?  I don't think you have this one.
Mr. Kapish: I texted it to you but it says message failed.  Itexted it to your personal phone.
Mr. Zuccaro: Why don't you just read it to me?
Mr. Kapish: VoteshawnCerra@gmail.com.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Consideration

of

Resolution

#2019-04
Proposed

Approving

the 2020
Public

Fiscal

Year

Budget and Setting the Hearing
Mr.  Kapish:  The  next thing  we  have  on  the  agenda  is the consideration

of

Resolution #2019-04 approving the proposed fiscal year 2020 budget and setting the public hearing. I think everybody got the proposed budget just now in their IPads. Now from what I understand what we are doing is we are setting a date for adopting the budget. Does that mean that no changes can be made to it?
Mr. Baldis:  No you can make changes.
Mr. Pawelczyk:  You just can't increase the assessment over what you establish
today.

15

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

Mr. Kapish:  That is what I am saying.	You couldn't do it after today.
Mr. Pawelczyk: You could do it but you would have to go through this process again. Actually you can't because you have to have a proposed budget in place by June 15th_
Mr. Kapish: Ok any discussion about the budget? Mr. Morgan: Well we don't plan on increasing it. Mr. Pfeiffer:  No need to.
Mr. Morgan: I wouldn't support increasing the budget.
Mr. Pawelczyk: You could move the numbers around here or you could lower it at the public hearing.
Mr. Kapish: What I am asking about too is that there is going to be expenses that we may not currently have now. I don't know what they come out of. Like the street lighting, is that coming out of the overall lighting that we used to have?
Mr. Baldis: I am not sure what you're asking.  The actual purchase of them? Mr. Kapish: The line item that it is coming out of, where is it coming out of? Mr. Pawelczyk: Are you talking about the electrical, the utility cost?
Mr. Kapish: Yes.
Mr. Baldis: It will come out of that item.  The rest is the bond money it is coming
out of.
Mr. Kapish: Right but what I am saying is that the lighting that we had was just minimal.  We had lighting for signs and that was very minimal.
Mr. Baldis: Those are things that you can just adjust as you go along. Mr. Kapish: Probably it should be labeled utility lighting or whatever. Mr. Baldis: We can change the line item names.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Right now your proposed budget is $80,000 for electric. I don't know if that includes your utility cost. I imagine it does.
Mr. Kapish: That is the proposed amount, is that what they went off last year? Mr. Baldis: Yes.
Mr. Kapish: Ok. What do you need?
Mr. Baldis: It has to be 60 days from today so August 12th or the 25th would be your best dates to set the date for the adoption.

16

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Mr. Kapish: Iwould think the 121h.
Mr. Pawelczyk: We would need a motion to adopt Resolution #2019-04 setting the public hearing date for August 12, 2019 at this location at 6:00 p.m.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Consideration of Proposal from AVS for Security Equipment

Mr. Kapish: We will go onto number 8.
Mr. Baldis: I think you can skip over that.  That is something that Marc Jaro sent me and Ijust put it in there in case he came.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Discussion of Letter from Stanford
& Sons Trucking Corp. Regarding

Turtle

Run

Boulevard

TOW

Improvement and Passive Park
Mr. Kapish: Discussion of letter from Stanford & Sons Trucking Corp. regarding Turtle Run Boulevard TOW improvement and Passive Park.
Mr. Baldis: Do you want to take that Bob?
Mr. Zuccaro: This is for the work that has already been done.
Mr. Geiger:  It is for the retainage on Turtle Run Boulevard right-of-way and for the permit fees for Passive Park.
Mr. Zuccaro:  We were double checking the as-builts for Passive Park so those funds could be released.  Jonathan talked about that a little earlier today that he has that · and he is checking that in the office.  That letter that they are talking about I don't have that letter with me.  If everything is good according to the as-builts then our feeling is that
we can release his monies.  One of the things that we were concerned about was the

17

ON MOTION by Mr. Morgan seconded by Mr. Pfeiffer with all in favor Resolution #2019-04 approving the proposed fiscal year 2020 budget and setting a public hearing date of August 12, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. at Governmental Management Services, 5383 N. Nob Hill Road, Sunrise, Florida was approved.

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

striping.	He has finished the striping. It is under one year warranty.  That was done a year ago in August I believe just before school opened up. Correct?
Mr. Geiger: Well no the temporary striping was.  The striping was done a little bit
later.
Mr. Kapish: It was more like October or November.
Mr. Zuccaro: I don't think we need to hold any money back from him because the County is moving slow on approving that.  Let me just see about this letter here.
Mr. Kapish: What about the striping on the rest of Turtle Run Boulevard, has that been approved?
Mr. Geiger: The bike lane stuff? The City of Coral Springs gave us an approval. Basically we need Broward County Traffic engineering approval. Because the City of Coral Springs wanted us to put the bike signs in. I happen to put bike signage o.n that which is also included on the sign post replacement plans so I will be submitting the bike lane striping, Iwill submit that after I submit the sign post plans to Broward County.
Mr. Zuccaro: In this letter what he is requesting is to share the amount of the expired permit fees. We told him that initially we thought that would be his responsibility, he as the GC but his position is that US Brick & Block are the ones that delayed it. He didn't engage in the contract with them that was done by the District. To put this thing to bed he is offering to share the cost and split the cost with the District. I think that this thing has been around for so long. We have spent more time reviewing it then what it is worth.  I think is a good faith effort on both parties to share that cost.
Mr. Kapish: What is the cost? Mr. Zuccaro: $994.
Mr. Baldis: Do you have a copy of the letter there? Mr. Zuccaro:  Yes.
Mr. Baldis: What is the rest of the money that he is asking for, what is the total? Mr. Zuccaro: The rest of the money that he is asking for is not in this letter.
Mr. Baldis: We need to know what the amount is.
Mr. Pawelczyk: There is two items. One is the permit that lapsed because the contractor failed to renew the permit. The contractor said it was US Bricks fault because

18

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

they were operating apparently under the same permit but still the contractor that pulled the permit is really responsible.
Mr. Baldis: It is a fair request to split it.
Mr. Pawelczyk: That is the minor issue. That is just $994 to renew the permit. That will close the permit out. The second item deals with there is two projects that Stanford is working on Turtle Run Boulevard Central and Passive Park. Neither one of which is completed.
Mr. Geiger:  His work is completed, yes.
Mr. Pawelczyk: So there is no other work that has to be done.
Mr. Geiger: The Passive Park is complete. It just needs to be closed out. Mr. Pawelczyk: In that case we are holding retainage of $7,000.
Mr. Kapish: The pavers, have they ever been fixed?
Mr. Baldis: They have been fixed twice that I know of. That is totally different then what this is about.
Mr. Kapish: Ok.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Then Turtle Run Boulevard Central, there is retainage according to the engineer of $43,406.99 that the District is holding which is typically held until the contract is completed and then the retainage is paid. I guess here they are explaining there is County and striping issues but if we release all the retainage, what encourages them to come back and finish. Have we paid them in full? I don't know the answer to these questions.
Mr. Geiger: They have been paid up to minus the retainage at this point.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Why would we pay for everything? Why would we pay the full amount of retainage if they still have $5,000 to $10,000 work.
Mr. Zuccaro: They don't, they finished everything.
Mr. Geiger: There is the striping depending on the County inspection that might need to get fixed.
Mr. Zuccaro: I think the hammer that you have on them is that from when they
completed their construction they have to warranty the work for a full year.   Now if the County drags their feet and takes longer than that.

19

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

Mr. Geiger: It is not the County at this point. I can't submit to the County until those decorative sign posts go up on Turtle Run Boulevard. Until those get installed I can't send it to the County because they are not going to approve it because the plans have decorative sign posts on it.
Mr. Kapish:  Is it necessary that we have all these things connected?
Mr. Geiger: It is necessary because the decorative sign poles are on the plans for Turtle Run Boulevard. The County saw decorative poles.
Mr. Kapish: I mean the striping.  Why can't they just go out and strip the road? Mr. Geiger: The roaq is stripped.
Mr. Kapish: Remember we were adding striping.
Mr. Geiger: The symbols? They never reviewed that.  That is outside the scope of work of Turtle Run Boulevard Central.
Mr. Kapish: We were submitting that to the city to have that reviewed so we can strip that. Right?
Mr. Geiger: That and other parts that aren't Turtle Run Boulevard Central.  I can't send those plans to Broward County until I get approval for the sign pole post.
Mr. Kapish: Alright.
Mr. Baldis: How much dollar-wise is the striping that we are looking at for what Stanford is required to do on this?
Mr. Geiger: Right now I don't know if he is required to do, are we talking about Turtle Run Boulevard Central?
Mr. Baldis: We are talking about what he is requesting of his retainage.
Mr. Geiger: I can't tell you I don't know what Broward is going to say.  I thought there was issues but Broward County, they are a whole' different ballgame.
Mr. Kapish:  Why can't we just get a simple answer from Broward County saying either this is.
Mr. Geiger: I haven't submitted it yet because I can't submit until. Mr. Zuccaro: They want to see the plans.
Mr. Baldis: Let me ask you this.  What normally would striping cost?  Would it be
$5,000?  Would it be $7,000?  Would it be $10,000 because Stanford just wants to get

20

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

his money.  Maybe we give him $30,000 of his retainage and move forward.  He is going to be happy.  We are still going to be covered and we can move on.
Mr. Pawelczyk: What I would do is pick a number and say we agreed to pay out this amount in retainage.
Mr. Baldis: Right that is what I am asking.
Mr. Pawelczyk:  We hold back $13,000 or $10,000 and then we agree to revisit it if the County hasn't made a decision by blank day.
Mr. Baldis: Right and just move it forward.
Mr. Pawelczyk:  That is how I would do it.  They are a good contractor with the District, right?
Mr. Kapish: I think that is a good idea.
Mr. Baldis: The whole striping on Creekside was $6,000. I think we do what we just
said.
Mr. Kapish: What are we holding? Mr. Geiger $43,000.
Mr. Zuccaro: He should get everything but maybe hold $6,000 back. Mr. Kapish: Ok whatever that is.
Mr. Pawelczyk: I would say the motion would be we will do one motion.	You tell me if I am off on this. A motion authorizing splitting the outstanding renewal permit fee of
$994 with Stanford and authorizing the retainage payment for the Passive Park project of
$7,069.50  and  further  authorizing  payment  of  a  portion  of  the  retainage  which  is
$43,406.99 where the District will agree to pay everything but $6,000, we will hold $6,000 back and agree to revisit this in 60 days if the County has not made a decision.
Mr. Kapish:  How much is that total? Mr. Pawelczyk: $37,406.99 right.
Mr. Pfeiffer: That sounds about right.
Mr. Pawelczyk: The motion is that we would give them back whatever retainage we are holding except $6,000. We would keep $6,000 in our account before we pay them and then in sixty days or 45 days?  Doesn't matter.
Mr. Geiger: It is going to depend on the decorative poles.

21

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Mr. Pawelczyk: That is not the point. The point is that I don't think it is fair for the District to have a contract with a contractor and say we are just going to hold this $6,000 indefinitely when the contractor has no control over that striping requirement.
Mr. Zuccaro: I agree.  60 days Ithink is fair.
Mr. Pawelczyk:  They are constantly doing work for us right.
Mr. Kapish: Ijust wantto know when we are going to get some street signs in the ground.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Turtle Run Boulevard Central is not street signs.
Mr. Geiger: I am waiting on street signs to close out a permit with Broward County Traffic Engineering Division. So until all those decorative goes up, Stanford has nothing to with that though.  Not contracted.
Mr. Kapish: That is another thing that has been going on for two years is the street signs.  Just saying.
Mr. Zuccaro: That is a different issue. Mr. Pfeiffer: So moved.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Iwill reiterate John's motion for the second if that would be helpful. Basically we will split the permit fee. The District will pay half of $994 which is the renewal permit fee. Stanford will pay the other. The District will pay the full amount of retainage remaining on the Passive Park based on the engineer's representation that the project is complete. The District will pay all retainage except for $6,000 for the Turtle Run Boulevard Central project with an agreement that the Board will revisit it within 60 days
pending Broward County review.

22

On MOTION by Mr. Pfeiffer seconded by Mr. Morgan with all in favor authorizing the split payment for the permit renewal cost of $994, and also authorizing the payment of the retainage of $7,069.50 for the Passive Park, and further authorizing payment of a portion of the retainage for Turtle Run Boulevard Central in the amount of $43,406.99 and the District  agrees  to  pay  everything  except  $6,000  totaling
$37,406.99 The Board agrees to revisit this in 60 days if the County has not made a decision was approved.

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Mr. Kapish: Let me say one thing, have you jogged that pathway recently? Mr. Morgan: Yes.
Mr. Kapish: Is that rebar still sticking up?
Mr. Morgan: I didn't go this weekend that way.
Mr. Pfeiffer: Where was the rebar because I didn't notice any?
Mr. Kapish: Rebar sticks up out of the ground when you get close to the circle, where the circle kind of comes back together, there is a piece of rebar along the walkway which is inches off the walkway and sticks up this high.
Mr. Morgan: I tried to pull it out and I couldn't pull it out.
Mr. Kapish: We just need somebody to go there with a saw and cut it. Mr. Pfeiffer: Ididn't notice it yesterday.
Mr. Kapish: It is a hazard.
Mr. Pfeiffer: Especially at night there is no lighting.
Mr. Zuccaro: Where is it at?  Dennis can you show us where it is at? Mr. Baldis: That is the area. We will just have to go out there and look. Mr. Pfeiffer: Oh right there. I went zipping past there.
Mr. Zuccaro: Why don't we have Stanford go cut it?
Mr. Baldis: It is US Brick who left it like this. They also left a pallet of bricks sitting out there which we can use at the other sidewalk on the east side. I will see if Robert can get someone with a saw to cut it.
Mr. Kapish: We just need it cut.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Consideration of Proposal from

Industrial

Divers

Corporation

for Culvert Pipe Cleaning

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Inspection

Report

from

Industrial Divers Corporation

Mr. Kapish:  Dennis?
Mr. Baldis: Igave you a copy of the divers report. I printed out copies of everything
they wanted to do as far as cleaning.  I gave you a copy of 2018 and 2019 if you would like to look at them.  My suggestions are as follows.  Site 2 I wouldn't clean.  It is similar

23

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

to what it was last year. The same goes with Site 10. It is similar to what it was last year. You can compare the two. Site 12 every year there is a little issue there. I have asked the city to vacuum that out and they are going to do that.  We can clean it out if you want. It is subjective. I don't think it is an issue where it is going to cause flooding. Site 15 is one that  is actually  off private property that we inspect every year but we  never do
anything because it is offsite.  It is this area over here. Once the rainy season starts a lot

of this stuff gets washed out.  There is a pipe over in this swale area they check.

It is

nothing to do with the District. It just flows into our lake and they started cleaning it and we keep it clean. The thing that was good this year was under Sample Road there is nothing there. The lady from the townhomes here is asking if we have something to keep plastic bottles and stuff that flow in there and the answer is no we don't have a fish grade or anything. The responsibility for cleaning that is actually Coral Landings II. As you see the report there is really nothing in there to mention other than she has a bunch of plastic bottles where her irrigation pump sucks out. I don't think that is really our responsibility to clean their suction line out there. That is what I recommend but it is subjective to what you would like.
Mr. Kapish:  So are you recommending that they do the work? Mr. Baldis: No.  I don't believe so.
Mr. Kapish: You are saying that all the sites are clear.
Mr. Kapish: You can take that with you and come back. We don't have to decide tonight but I gave you copies of 2018 and 2019 and you can compare them and come back. At this present time there is nothing pressing that I see that Iwould do.
Mr. Kapish: Can we get the city to clean out the...
Mr. Baldis: I have already requested them to vacuum out the two catch basins on Turtle Run Boulevard under the FPL easement.
Mr. Kapish: Ok.
Mr. Baldis: You can just review that if you want to change and do one of them, I am ok with it.  I don't see anything pressing.

24

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

TWELVETH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Appointment of Audit Selection Committee

Audit Selection Committee Meeting
A. Opening Audit Selection Committee Meeting
Mr. Kapish:  Number 12 is the appointment of audit selection committee.
Mr. Pawelczyk: On your agenda GMS is actually taking the initiative to do some of the work ahead of time knowing that we are going to be doing this a number of times. Every three to five years you go through this. Under the Florida Statutes we need to appoint an auditor or select an auditor through the auditor selection process. That entails setting up an audit selection committee, advertising an RFP with certain criteria for evaluation· and then thereafter ranking respondents to the RFP and authorizing us to go out and negotiate a letter of agreement with that auditor. The first thing we need to do is we need to do a motion to appoint the audit selection committee. You can appoint anyone to that committee but what we have done in the past is to appoint the members of the Board of Supervisors as members of the audit selection committee.  If you would like to
do that again a so moved would be in order.

B.  Roll Call
Mr. Pawelczyk: The next thing we are doing is the roll. There is no need to take roll call, I will just report that Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Morgan and Mr. Kapish are here in person and Ms. Karnegis and Mr. Carney are present by phone.   So all the members of the
committee are here.

C. Ratification for Criteria for Evaluation
Mr. Pawelczyk: What we need to do now is ratify the criteria for evaluation. The Statute requires you to consider ability of personal, proposer's experience, the understanding of the scope of work, ability to furnish the required services and it also
allows the District to set other criteria one of which would be price.  We recommend that

25

On MOTION by Mr. Pfeiffer seconded by Mr. Morgan with all in favor appointing the Board of Supervisors of the Turtle Run Community Development District to serve as the audit selection committee was approved.

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

those four criteria I mentioned and price be considered as criteria for evaluation of the
auditors that are presenting.  We need a motion to ratify those five criteria for evaluation by the committee.

D. Ratification of RFP
Mr. Pawelczyk:  Next in your backup you will see that the RFP has already been advertised and there have been a couple of respondents.  We need a motion to ratify
GMS's action to advertise the RFP with the selection criteria that you since ratified.

E.  Ranking of Respondents to the RFP
Mr. Pawelczyk: Now still as the audit selection committee you will note that you have two proposers. One is Carr, Riggs & Ingram and the other is Grau & Associates. You will need to come up with a ranking of the number 1 and number 2 ranked firm using the criteria sheet that is included in your backup. The Board can do this a number of ways. You can fill that out individually or you can discuss it as a Board and adopt a final ranking.  I don't know if the manager has anything to add on that.
Mr. Baldis: No. Other than previously Carr did it the last four years. Mr. Pfeiffer: And we are happy with their performance?
Mr. Baldis: Either company, both these companies do a lot of CDD's. Mr. Kapish: We had Grau at one time.
Mr. Baldis: It changes according to price.
Mr. Pawelczyk: I think the last time you did this I think one of you filled out the ranking criteria because you had a chance to review it in advance and then you accepted as a Board.   It is really how you wish to proceed at this point.
Mr. Pfeiffer: Should we just rank it now?

26

On MOTION by Mr. Morgan seconded by Mr. Pfeiffer with all in favor ratifying the RFP was approved.

On MOTION by Mr. Morgan seconded by Mr. Pfeiffer with all in favor ratifying the criteria for evaluation was approved.

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run COD

Mr.  Pawelczyk:  You  just  need  to  fill  out  this  sheet. recommendation based on his review of the proposals.
Mr. Morgan: What is your recommendation Mr. Chair?

think  Chris  has  a

Mr. Pawelczyk: We have other Board members that are present by phone. The Board has ranked the proposals really equally across the board giving 20 points to both Carr, Riggs and Grau for the first four criteria. Then because Grau came in at a lower price on a four year contract Grau is given 20 points and Carr, Riggs was given 10 points. 100 points to Grau and 90 Points to Carr, Riggs & Ingram. Is there a motion to rank Grau
number 1 and Carr, Riggs number 2 based on that evaluation.

F.  Adjournment
Mr. Pawelczyk: Lastly you are adjourning your audit selection committee. We don't
need a motion for that.

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Selection of Audit Firms

Mr. Pawelczyk: Now you are putting your Board hat on and the Board has just been presented with the ranking with Grau & Associates #1 and Carr, Riggs & Ingram #2. Do we  have motion to  authorize staff to work with  Grau  & Associates  to  have an
engagement letter for a four year agreement with them?

27

On MOTION by Mr. Morgan seconded by Mr. Pfeiffer with all in favor authorizing staff to work with Grau & Associates to have an engagement letter for a four year agreement with them was approved.

On MOTION by Mr. Morgan seconded by Mr. Pfeiffer with all in favor the ranking of respondents to the RFP as follows; with Grau & Associates as #1 and Carr, Riggs & Ingram as #2 was approved.

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

FOURTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
A.  Attorney

Staff Reports

Mr. Pawelczyk:   As far as my report which is next on the agenda I don't have anything to report other than the easements, we will work with Dennis and get those out
and distribute what we have and what we know.

8. Engineer - Approval of Change Orders
Mr. Zuccaro: Nothing on the engineer's side as far as change orders.
Mr. Kapish: Jonathan you said you guys were close to the topography for the sidewalk that Stanford is supposed to be doing over there on the east side?
Mr. Geiger: I am just waiting for an updated survey. We just have to grade out the area that goes through the little wooded area. Other than that it is just going to be submitted to DRC.
Mr. Kapish: Ok.

C.	Field Manager
D.	Manager
Mr. Baldis:  A couple things I have for you.   I have a proposal to remove seven cedar trees along Creekside Drive.  Flush cut them, and put in sod.  It is for $1,829.63.
Mr. Kapish: Along here?
Mr. Baldis: Up here where I am pointing. Mr. Morgan: How many trees is that?
Mr. Baldis: Seven plus sod.
Mr. Kapish: We need a motion on that.

Mr. Baldis:  I talked to Superior Concrete. They are going to be able to come in and start installing fencing either the week of July 81h or July 15th. I am happy that we are
going to have The Shoppes easement hopefully signed by then so we can get all of this

28

On MOTION by Mr. Pfeiffer seconded by Mr. Morgan with all in favor accepting the proposal in the amount of $1,829.63 to remove seven cedar trees along Creekside Drive was approved.

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

fencing done.  I also have the benches we talked about, what type of design you would like on the bench.  This is the one from Deerfield.  Garbage cans.
Mr. Kapish:  One thing about the garbage cans at least they have covers.
Mr. Baldis: The problem that we had with the other ones is they stole the metal tent. These appear to be plastic or some type of other material other than the metal. That was one of the issues because they did have them but it wasn't a cover. It didn't cover as much as this.  This looks like it is a little better product as far as the lid goes.
Mr. Kapish: I think the can like we have without the Aztec design because this is like blank. It doesn't have a design on it.
Mr. Baldis: Like this is what you are talking about.
Mr. Kapish: This is plain. Some of them have that Aztec design.  Basically a circle with a Turtle because I think that is simple.
Mr. Baldis: Just the turtle.
Mr. Kapish: We don't need any names on it.
Mr. Baldis: Do you want the cattails on each side of the turtle? Mr. Kapish: No.
Mr. Baldis: Just the plain turtle.  Ok.  Do you want anything on the back, the street side?  Just this bench as you see it?
Mr. Kapish: Yes.
Mr. Baldis: Alright I will come back and get you a price for that.
Mr. Morgan: If you go back to the trash receptacles I think the one with just our logo and don't have any of that garbage on the lid.
Mr. Baldis: Just the turtle, just like what is on the bench.  Keep it simple.  I agree with you.  I will get you a price.
Mr. Pfeiffer: Do we have a name for the turtle Chris? Mr. Kapish: You want to officially name the turtle?
Mr. Baldis: Why don't you have a contest? Mr. Kapish: That may be in the future.
Mr. Baldis: That is what I had for you this evening.
Mr. Kapish: I got a call over the weekend about a pipe gushing water. Mr. Baldis:  At 441 and Sample, yes.

29

June 3, 2019

Turtle Run CDD

Mr. Kapish: 'What is going on?
Mr. Baldis: Well we are in the process of adding the irrigation there. I think there was just something where a pipe broke or what but that is what is going on there. With the new pump we are going to have irrigation around the corner from Lowes. That will all be irrigated.
Mr. Kapish: So that is all fixed?
Mr. Baldis: I told them about it today and they were going to send a guy down there.  He is still working on it.  I am sure when he turned it on, it came on.
Mr. Kapish: Tortoise Way, the landscaping was removed.  Is it sodded yet? Mr. Baldis:  No. It will be done this week.
Mr. Kapish: Or do you want to wait till it starts raining?
Mr. Baldis: I don't know. We have the irrigation, that should be sufficient. I would rather have it there and look finished then another project halfway done.
Mr. Kapish: I have something for you. In the roundabout a couple meetings ago Skip mentioned that the lights were out. There are still some out. I went through there and didn't take note which ones they are, but there is a few that are out.
Mr. Baldis: Ok I will call Lux.
Mr. Kapish: I guess you would have to go out there at night and see which ones are out.
Mr. Carney: When you are moving east to west just before you make that turn before the school those yellow ones.
Mr. Baldis: Ok.
Mr. Kapish: What is the warranty on those? Mr. Baldis: It was a year.
Mr. Kapish: They haven't been in a year have they? Mr. Baldis: I don't think so.
Mr. Kapish:  I think it will be a year pretty soon.
Mr. Baldis: He was asked to come out once.  They came out and replaced some.
I will tell him to come out again.
Mr. Kapish: My question is also too is what is wrong with them that they are not lighting.

30

Turtle Run COD

June 3, 2019

Mr. Baldis: I would have to ask them that.
Mr.  Kapish:  That would  be  my  question  because  I am just  curious  is there something that is preventing the solar panel.
Mr. Baldis:  When they sold it to us they said they even worked in the shade.   It
has to be something with the product.  I will call him tomorrow morning.

FIFTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Supervisor Requests

Mr. Kapish:  Supervisor requests.	Zaida do you have anything for us? Ms. Karnegis: No.
Mr. Kapish: Skip do you have anything? Mr. Carney: Nothing thank you.
Mr. Kapish:  John?
Mr. Pfeiffer: Actually when is the next meeting? Mr. Pawelczyk: July 24th.
Mr. Pfeiffer:  I will be back.  Iwill be on time. Mr. Morgan: I have nothing.
Mr. Kapish:  The next meeting, what we want to do is we want to get the roadway

going.

Mr. Baldis: Oh yeah for sure.  You will have that to review sooner than later.

Mr. Kapish: I think it looks like one is under the threshold the other is not. know how that works out.
Mr. Pawelczyk: You would have to bid it.
Mr. Kapish: Ok now we just need a motion to adjourn the meeting.

I don't

SIXTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Pfeiffer seconded by Mr. Morgan with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.

31