MINUTES OF MEETING TURTLE RUN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Turtle Run Community Development District was held on Monday, February 10, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. at the offices of Governmental Management Services, 5385 N. Nob Hill Road, Sunrise, Florida 33351.

Present and constituting a quorum:
Chris Kapish Lance Morgan Skip Carney Zaida Karnegis John Pfeiffer

Also present were:

Dennis Baldis Michael Pawelczyk Jonathan Geiger

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairman Vice Chairman
Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary (phone)

District Manager District Counsel KCI Technologies

Roll Call

Mr. Baldis called the meeting to order and called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS
A moment of silence was held.

Moment of Silence

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mr. Baldis led the pledge of allegiance.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Pledge of Allegiance

Good News

Mr. Kapish: Skip do you have any good news for us? Mr. Carney: No it is all good.
Mr. Kapish: Zaida?
Ms. Karnegis: All good.

Mr. Kapish: John do you have anything? Mr. Pfeiffer: It is all good thank you.
Mr. Kapish: Lance?
Mr. Morgan: Nope can't beat that. Mr. Baldis: I am good too.

FIFTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
Mr. Kapish: Public comments. No one from the public here.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Update	and	Discussion	of
Projects for the Bonds
Mr. Kapish: Jonathan, you have everything right?
Mr. Geiger: Pretty much. I have all the news today. Let's start with Terrapin. We are still waiting to close that out. I have not been able to get a final inspection scheduled with the City of Coral Springs. Chad, the person who is in charge of that kind of stuff who reviews the plans was actually in the hospital last week. He was at work today. He worked half a day. I left him a message. He should be getting back to me tomorrow. I spoke with Najla about it as well and he should be back to me about scheduling the final inspection.
Mr. Kapish: Did we ever find out where these broken sidewalks are that they claimed there are?
Mr. Geiger: I haven't been out there in a while. I am going to have Coral Springs point out what they are.
Mr. Baldis: We haven't done the walk.
Mr. Geiger: I don't know if it is something they are nitpicking that  really  doesn't  need to be addressed or if it was something that got fixed after they saw it but hopefully I should be able to schedule that this week and get that done. They installed  all the pavement markings and signage per the plans.  That happened  late last  week.  I  think they got everything done by Friday so I have to go back out there and check that again. I should be able to submit the inspection package for Broward Cou,nty Traffic soon.  We have to do a nighttime inspection still. Now that they have all the stripping down correctly, we need to go back out and look at it at night for the reflectivity. That is the last thing that  we normally have to do.

Mr. Kapish: Did they put the RPM's in?
Mr. Geiger: Yes they should all be in. Our CEI guy didn't indicate any missing when he did his daytime inspection. I will verify everything before I submit it. Other than that we were contacted by the City of Coral Springs about the median nose - the bullnose on Terrapin and Sample. I guess they had a really bad accident there about two weeks ago. The guy was in ICU. He got t-boned by a truck though.
Mr. Kapish: It was on Sample Road though.
Mr. Geiger: He was making the left onto Terrapin from Sample. The city contacted me. They went out there with the County, the people that review our traffic plans normally. They recommended that we meet with FOOT to address the issue. Technically that bullnose is in the FOOT right-of-way. They would like us to take a look at it. My office has advised us until we figure out if there was a design issue not to contact FOOT. We are not even sure if FOOT is going to want to get involved with this because we didn't pull a permit with FOOT so they technically don't have any liability or responsibility here. We are just trying to be careful about with who we get involved with in any of this.
Mr. Morgan: You said you were going to put stripping.
Mr. Geiger: The County originally had contacted us and we said we can go ahead and stripe it out and that should help. They recommended the guide line stripes in this but they also want us to meet with FOOT to take a look. Like I said my office wants us to run some analysis on it and make sure that there is nothing in there that is substandard or anything.  The City reviewed this. We reviewed it.  We didn't see any problem with it. I have made the turn. I don't know if this is an engineering dilemma here or if this is just someone wasn't paying attention when they were driving and they wound up getting hit which is unfortunate.
Mr. Morgan: When I jogged Saturday there was still debris. Mr. Geiger: That was two weeks ago too.
Mr. Morgan: It actually hit the curb. You know the curb that they always hit, where the intersection is, the curb.
Mr. Geiger: That little peanut island?

Mr. Morgan: No the curb to the west of that. There is a new big gauge. Before that construction they have had dozens in the last five or six years and even before that, that is just a bad turn.
Mr. Geiger: From what I have understood there has been accidents there before.
It happened at 11:00 at night. I figured this might not be an engineering thing.
Mr. Kapish: I am not saying that it was wrong what they did when they made
·	Terrapin a right out only, isn't that when they did Sample Road?
Mr. Baldis: Yes there was a lot of accidents there. We didn't do that. Mr. Kapish: Who did that work? Was it the city or the state?
Mr. Baldis: I think it was the state because they were working on Sample Road.
Mr. Kapish: They made that right out only and actually what happens is people come out of there and they make a left. They try and make a left and go through.  That is actually a lot of the accidents and problems there too.
Mr. Geiger: We are going to take a look at it. We are not going to get FOOT involved until we have to.
Mr. Kapish: When you say FOOT, are you talking about contacting Broward County Engineering?
Mr. Geiger: Florida Department of Transportation. Sample Road is an FOOT road. It is a state road. It is not within Broward County's jurisdiction technically. We are going to handle that as soon as we know.
Mr. Kapish: How do you do it, do you just send them an email?
Mr. Geiger: We actually do not know who to contact on this. Bob and I are basically trying to figure out who we would even contact. People in our office have contacts for FOOT but they cautioned us again to make sure we have all our ducks in a row before we go getting FOOT involved.
Mr. Kapish: Sure absolutely. We are not allowed to stripe a state road anyways. Mr. Geiger: I talked to Paul Carpenter about this. He kind of made it seem like
FOOT would take care of any work on Sample that had to be done and accomplished from this. Florida Blacktop is actually approved to do work on FOOT roads so they might wind up doing it since they are already doing the striping on Terrapin.

Mr. Kapish: What I think needs to be done is I think a lot of this traffic is because of Publix because of the right out only on Terrapin. We had no say about any of that stuff. That traffic is coming from that. I think they need to extend the bullnose on the left turn lane a little bit, maybe ten feet so it is closer to where you make a left.
Mr. Geiger: That is one thing that the City did mention to me is if they did work on Sample they would look to reduce that center island a little bit and extend the bullnose. They only asked us to address the bullnose on Terrapin.
Mr. Kapish: How would you do anything on the bullnose on Terrapin?
Mr. Geiger: So basically, our original design was to mimic what was there before, just extend it. We might just have to cut that back and get a better radius in there for left hand turns. It is the same shape. It is the radius there that they think is the issue.
Mr. Kapish: This radius here?
Mr. Geiger: Yes. So essentially that would need to get cut back a little bit, a bigger
radius.
Mr. Kapish: How would you do that when this whole median was widened?
Mr. Geiger: It would just be from the crosswalk to the bullnose basically. Basically
we would look at what we would have to shave off of there.
Mr. Kapish: Again I think the problem is here.
Mr. Geiger: I agree. That is why the City has asked FOOT get involved.
Mr. Kapish: They have these chevrons. You take these chevrons off. You actually have travelable pavement and extend this.
Mr. Geiger: Even with the chevrons there too, I make that turn a bunch. The guidelines will help obviously.
Mr. Kapish: The roadway doesn't really cause the accidents, it is the driver.
Mr. Geiger: That is why they asked to contact FOOT but we are not jumping through hoops because no one has said you need to do this immediately. If it was a real big safety concern they would have called us to meet us out there.
Mr. Kapish: You can make the safest thing in the world and still have problems. Mr. Geiger: If you have bad users you are going to have bad results. Creekside,
we  did  get the  approval  on the  left turn through  lane elimination.   The  County  has

approved that. The plans are currently in review with Coral Springs. Again the plan reviewer was out.
Mr. Kapish: Do you have a plan with you?
Mr. Geiger: I do actually. I have plans to show there were other revisions made as well. Let me get to that in a second though. As of now they have the entire curb installed northbound. They have the curb installed southbound all the way through NW 41st Drive. The rest of the curb is where the median is getting expanded. I haven't let them do that work until Coral Springs gives us the ok on the plans and everything. They only have that little bit of F-curb on the inside to pour and then they are going to switch over and start doing all the sidewalk, the outside curbing. The catch basins have been converted to flumes. They look good. They look nice this time. They are below grade which is good. They look like they are going to function too which is most important. So here is the other thing. We submitted plans to include the crosswalk striping across Turtle Run Boulevard and NW 31st Drive. Broward County Traffic Engineering's opinion and decision is they do not maintain crosswalks that are not at signals. They don't want us to strip those crosswalks out. I emailed Sharon Gross and asked her, hey, if we put a note on the plan that says Turtle Run is going to maintain them, can we put them in. Is there any way we can get this, I pointed out it is really kind of a safety issue. Turtle Run Boulevard is a wide section of road for people to be crossing. I know you guys have a lot of kids that walk through the neighborhoods too. Their position is that they don't put crosswalks at non­ signal intersections. Actually looking at the plans for Turtle Creek Drive for the MPO projects, the 90% plans had crosswalks striped out across Creekside but the 100% plans did not. They were also asked to remove them.
Mr. Baldis: Jonathan, are we talking the crosswalk across Turtle Run Boulevard? Mr. Geiger: Across Turtle Run Boulevard.
Mr. Baldis: Just right through here.
Mr. Geiger: Yes where you would naturally have one. I emailed Sharon Gross today and asked her if there was any way we can get that implemented. I did find out that even though the license agreement says that you guys are in charge of all the maintenance, Broward County does maintain the striping. I had to go back and forth with

Paul to figure out who is actually responsible for that. Mike, do you think that needs to be spelled out in those agreements?
Mr. Pawelczyk: If we see it come up again yes, because that is an agreement the city says it won't be responsible to maintain it but if the County is maintaining it and we are not allowed to touch it, our obligation is to make sure it is maintained. If it is not being maintained I guess we are supposed to call the County.
Mr. Kapish: Are all the poles centered with the existing improvements on Creekside?
Mr. Geiger: I would have to go out there and check on them but I do believe the first two medians closer to Wiles are centered. I think it is just this third one since we are expanding it, there is going to be I think two poles that are off center. I was thinking about, I figured that could be addressed whenever you guys do more lighting later, correct?
Mr. Baldis: We will see.
Mr. Kapish: There is also, seemed like curb to curb, there seems to be a lot of dirt put in there. Is that all part of Stanford's contract?
Mr. Geiger: He is not done with the topsoil behind the curbing yet. They are doing that this week as far as I am aware.
Mr. Baldis: A lot of the soil that they have taken is soil that was taken from the FPL easement where we put that sidewalk in. We had to fill in those areas.
Mr. Geiger: Do we want to push for those crosswalks, that is the question that I did have? I emailed Sharon Gross. If she says no, do I let it go?
Mr. Kapish: If the city is saying no, I don't know if we have any real position on it. Mr. Baldis: They are the experts.
Mr. Kapish: They are the city. Mr. Geiger: County.
Mr. Kapish: Well County.
Mr. Baldis: Which brings then the question, the dropped curb. We are saying there is ramps for people to go out into the street and the County and City are saying no, that is not a crosswalk.
Mr. Geiger: I did actually speak with Paul about that and he said it is like that all over the place where they have dropped curbs and there is no crosswalk.

Mr. Kapish: Yes but you are creating the image of a crosswalk. Maybe we should bring up the curb. If they want to cross there they still can.
Mr. Geiger: When I brought it up he kind of made it seem like the city wasn't going to let us take curb ramps out.
Mr. Kapish: Oh I don't understand that. Mr. Baldis: That is insanity.
Mr. Geiger: The city sees it as these are internal roads, they don't need crosswalks. They follow Broward County Traffic's recommendation on this but you do need to do the drop curb for people to get around.
Mr. Kapish: What happens if someone gets run over and they say that wasn't a crosswalk. That creates a problem.
Mr. Geiger: If someone gets hit in the crosswalk too, then who do they blame?
Mr. Kapish: If someone says that they shouldn't have been crossing there because there wasn't a crosswalk, that throws in another dynamic then to it.
Mr. Baldis: I guess what we are trying to say is it is either a crosswalk or isn't. Why do you need a dropped curb to go out into here?
Mr. Pawelczyk: A lawyer is going to twist no matter what. You guys know. Actually if you don't have a dropped curb there then you are going to say there is an ADA issue even though there is no crosswalk or that because there is no dropped curb and the person in the wheelchair fell into the intersection, then was hit by a car, you can allege negligence in design just as you could either way if you left it there and someone gets hit, does it create a condition that looks like they have the right to cross the street. I think it could really go either way.
Mr. Morgan: The state Statute says it is incumbent upon the pedestrian to use legal crosswalks, otherwise if you don't use a legal crosswalk you are committing a violation of jaywalking. Now the problem with that is pedestrians have the right-of-way in all traffic accidents. A lot of times 90% of all pedestrian accidents are the fault of the pedestrian, not the fault of the driver. Like you said it is a catch-22 either way.
Mr. Pawelczyk: I think we would just want to make sure that we have something from the city that says that this is the design they want and they don't want us to make

any further changes to the way it is out there. It is their roadway and it is their right-of­ way. This is the design they want and I think that needs to be clear.
Mr. Kapish: So it should be in writing.
Mr. Pawelczyk: I would think so, something in writing, some email from somebody. It just needs to be pointed out that no, don't take any further action to make any changes to our city right-of-ways in that area, leave it the way it is.
Mr. Geiger: I am not even sure who I would ask about this. Reach out to Paul?
Mr. Pawelczyk: You brought it up in the meeting so I think we need to do something.
Mr. Morgan: Just have him write an email reaffirming our conversation. You don't have an issue.
Mr. Geiger: I don't know if Paul can make the decisions on that because he is just a traffic management person.
Mr. Kapish: Then he needs to find out the person who is.
Mr. Geiger: I can talk to him and see if we can get something in writing.
Mr. Pawelczyk: If they are telling us not to do it, we just want to make sure it makes sense that we are doing what is right for their right-of-way. It is not ours.
Mr. Geiger: I do want to clarify if we are not putting crosswalk striping there, then is the idea then that we do want to take these ramps out? If we are not even planning on taking these ramps out, I don't know if I want to go further on this.
Mr. Pawelczyk: We are asking the City what they want us to do with their right-of­ way based on the plans that they previously approved.
Mr. Baldis: We want them to sign off that this is what they want.
Mr. Kapish: You want it done now because Stanford is out there doing all that construction.
Mr. Pawelczyk: I don't think there is anything lawfully or there is nothing negligent in my eyes about the current design but that doesn't mean like we said, a lawyer can come up and say so, but at least if the City is onboard, we don't want the City coming back if someone gets hurt and says, oh no, that was Turtle Run that did that. We want them to say no, that is the design we all approved and that is the way it is supposed to be.

Mr. Geiger: This matches the license agreement plan. This matches the County approved stuff. I think we already have the City approvals. If they didn't want it to be this way, they would have pointed it in the review process.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Ask to make sure that they don't want us to put a crosswalk.
Mr. Geiger: They don't. I have comments from Broward County saying don't put a crosswalk here, at least the striping.
Mr. Pawelczyk: That is probably sufficient if you have that.
Mr. Baldis: I think you need to ask about the dropped curb. Just ask do you want the dropped curbs or don't you. They will go yes or no. That is the discussion. Striping is not going to happen. Do you want these dropped curbs or not? Yes or no and whatever they say we will do.
Mr. Geiger: Ok. He is going to say, yes, keep them there like they are but I will get it in writing.
Mr. Baldis: That is all we want him to say.
Mr. Geiger: The other thing talking to Paul Carpenter, they did recommend and I know that you also spoke about this, extending the bullnose on Turtle Creek to help eliminate people from still trying to go through and left. The City did ask us to revise our plans to extend the bullnose down there.
Mr. Kapish: You mean by Walmart?
Mr. Geiger: Turtle Creek and Creekside where we are extending the bullnose, the southwest bullnose there. That one there. I have revised plans to extend that out about 30 feet. These are all the latest revisions on Creekside. I did print one for everybody. These include the median revisions. The revisions to this bullnose specifically so you can see it. This is as far as we could extend it given the radius that we had to work with. There is a restriction on the inside turning radius here. I think 40 is the minimum we could go down to. That will facilitate a turn of a car or box truck. Bigger trucks are going to have a little bit of a hard time but you have two lanes over here so they should have enough room to turn. This is as far as we could take it out without impacting cars.
Mr. Kapish: That is good because if they have to go do this then they are going to have to go around this to get across.

Mr. Geiger: You will clearly look like you are doing something wrong now to get across there. Obviously if you really want to, you are going to be able to do it with the right turn only sign here. We are also going to do, these are actual stripped out guidelines to kind of help. We will see if the County and the City wants or doesn't want those. That will be actual striping in the road. This becomes a kind of tight turn. We were looking to do something in the center but because of the way we stopped all of the traffic going straight across, it doesn't really facilitate doing like a little diverter in the middle.
Mr. Baldis: Is this one getting extended at all?
Mr. Geiger: No, there really is no reason to extend that one. It is not going to block anybody from the movements we are trying to restrict.
Mr. Baldis: This is where they are turning here and this is coming out to about
here?
Mr. Kapish: But they would go straight across here.
Mr. Geiger: They are still allowed to go straight across there. Mr. Kapish: Yes I know.
Mr. Morgan: The only thing we are ending is the left turn.
Mr. Geiger: Yes and the through movement there. The whole lane is coming out
so it is going to be right turn only.
Mr. Morgan: There isn't going to be anything in the center right?
Mr. Geiger: No. Because of the through movement from the other side of the road we really can't put one there. We also have people doing what they do on Sample which is going through that anyways.
Mr. Kapish: I have seen people coming out of Terrapin on Sample, I have seen them make a left. ·
Mr. Geiger: I have considered it once or twice but haven't done it. Speaking with Paul, this does need to get City Commission approval. If I get the go ahead on th se plans, I can get them to him by Friday, he said we would make the March 4th City Commission to address this. They are just going to amend the license agreement we have now with the new plans.
Mr. Baldis: Is he going to let us work on this while we are waiting? Mr. Geiger: I am not sure.

Mr. Baldis: That is what he indicated previously right?
Mr. Geiger: Not that I am aware of but honestly with the work that Stanford has now this could be done after everything else.
Mr. Baldis: He has enough to keep busy.
Mr. Kapish: The issue is Jonathan he has that all torn out. There are cones up
there.
Mr. Geiger:  This  is a whole separate thing.	This part engineering just has to
approve. The Turtle Creek stuff is what...
Mr. Kapish: So can he continue to work on that.
Mr. Geiger: As soon as I get the word from engineering to let them go ahead and do the work.
Mr. Baldis: So we are going to complete the right turn only and then we are going to wait to do this after that?
Mr. Geiger: It might have to happen that way.
Mr. Baldis: That is ok. At least Creekside will be completed.
I
Mr. Geiger: If you guys are good with these plans I would like to get them over to
the City because they have to do their review and everything, make sure they are ok with them.
Mr. Kapish: Is everybody good with them? Ms. Karnegis: Yes.
Mr. Geiger: Like I said I can wait a couple of days. Mr. Baldis: No.
Mr. Kapish: We don't want anything waiting.
Mr. Geiger: I will get them to Paul tomorrow then. I think that was pretty much it on Creekside. They are moving along. Everything has looked pretty good so far. Stanford did send me today very late a price to fix the dip on Turtle Run Boulevard off of Creekside that we identified. We walked it and there was about, well you can see where the pipe goes under the road. When we measured it out, it was about 80 feet from where the bullnose curb turns it west and that gets to you about right where the catch basin on the side of the road is, where that dip is. I asked Stanford to price that out and while we were out there I also noticed you have a road cracking for about another 100 and so feet

there. I asked him just to give a price on the 80 feet that would cover all the way up to where that pipe is. Then I had him go out 240 feet to where the cracking kind of was the worst.
Mr. Kapish: Why is it cracking?
Mr. Geiger: Honestly down the road I don't know. I don't know why that part is. It's parallel with the road. It is not across the road so it is not like the situation where you have the dip from the settlement or whatever is going on. I figured if he is already milling and resurfacing, I was just going to see if we could get a price to do a little bit more if you guys wanted to go ahead and get more of that redone. The price is to just fix the area up to where the dip is $2,787.06. That is to go basically up to the curb and then on the side of the road. To go the 240 feet which takes you to right to about where the left turn lane kind of starts was $7,548.22. Same unit cost for the mill and resurface. It is a little bit more on the MOT because it is a longer stretch they would have to shut down.
Mr. Baldis: So it is either here or up to here. This is cracked. When we walked this you could see the road cracking. You can take a look at it.
Mr. Kapish: I have seen it. I saw it months ago.
Mr. Baldis: I think we need to ask Stanford his opinion on why it is cracking.
Mr. Geiger: Without opening the road up it is hard for us to really tell what is going on. Where the worst part is clearly from that pipe.
Mr. Kapish: I just figured while we are there, we could do that,	just do a change order there and take care of it.
Mr. Baldis: $7,548.22.
Mr. Geiger: I only identified where it was the worst. There is still cracking all the way to the roundabout. I figured that is where it was still single lane there.
Mr. Kapish: I think you need to ask him why is it cracking. We will fix this thing for now but I would like to know why it is cracking.
Mr. Baldis: We will ask him before he just paves it why it is cracking. Mr. Kapish: You would need a motion to approve that now right.
Mr. Geiger: I do have a change order for it. Mr. Baldis: How many feet is it?

Mr. Geiger: On his it is 143 square yards. Are we going for the whole run? Then it is 471 square yards of mill and resurface.
Mr. Kapish: And that is $7,548.22, do we agree to fix it? Mr. Morgan: It definitely needs to be repaired?
Mr. Geiger: The one area does where the dip is. You could get away with the cracking. It is whether you want to do more now or do more later basically. Eventually you are going to have to mill and resurface the whole run instead of piecing it together.
Mr. Kapish: Ok we just need a motion for the repair of Turtle Run Boulevard coming off of Creekside on the westbound lane.

On MOTION by Ms. Karnegis seconded by Mr. Morgan with all in favor accepting the proposal to repair Turtle Run Boulevard coming off Creekside on the westbound lane in the amount of $7,548.22 was approved.

Mr. Pawelczyk:	That  will be in the  form  of  a change  order I assume.	Which contract was that?
Mr. Geiger: Stanford. The Creekside Drive right-of-way improvements. I will have an actual AIA form next meeting.
Mr. Pawelczyk: That is fine. You can get it before the meeting if you want to get it
signed before because you approved it h"ere today.  For the record I just wanted to know which contractor it was.
Mr. Geiger: It was change order #5 from Stanford. That is all I have on Creekside unless anybody has any questions about construction. They are pretty much, Kevin says the City is basically what is holding them up now. They are ready to keep moving and everything but he is hesitant to order concrete until they can get a lot in there. I told him hopefully this week by tomorrow I hope I should know if the City is going to let us do this work while they review.
Mr. Morgan: Are they ahead of schedule?
Mr. Geiger: If they weren't waiting on this approval they would probably be ahead of schedule. He is just going to have to make the decision to start doing some of that

side work while they wait. I believe they need to be done by the end of the month. That is without all the additional work requests though too.
Mr. Baldis: We are making a change there so you have to give them more time because we are making the right turn only now.
Mr. Geiger: We let Stanford know in the pre-construction meeting that if that got approved it would be a little bit to get all the City on board and all that.
Mr. Kapish: They are actually moving fairly quickly.
Mr. Geiger: Yes. In speaking to Kevin he thinks they can get most - two days to get the curb and the sidewalk on the outside. Two days one side and two days on the other. He said they can probably demo it all out, form it and pour it all in one day on one side and switch over. I think once they get the approvals they are going to be able to just pick back up full speed.
Mr. Kapish: Who is doing the sod work for the median there? Mr. Geiger: I believe it is in Stanford's contract.
Mr. Kapish: What about the trees?
Mr. Baldis: I am waiting for a proposal from Robert.
Mr. Kapish: Can you get a proposal from somebody else too? Mr. Baldis: I will.
Mr. Geiger: I spoke today with Kevin about the lake path on Turtle Creek Drive. They had their sidewalk walk through with the City yesterday. They passed that. They have two more inspections. They have zoning which basically zoning comes out and looks and says the path is in the right spot. That is where it was on the plans and they have the final engineering that they need to schedule after zoning. Zoning is scheduled for Wednesday. They said the final engineering they should be able to get done Friday. They are thinking that permit should be closed out Friday. The City hasn't indicated if they need as-builts yet. So we are going to keep on with that. If we need as-builts we will get survey out there. They fixed all of the issues that I had through my first walk through. The last time I was out there, there were no cracked bricks. The header curb was addressed. The concrete path section was poured. Everything looked nice. The only thing I have asked them to do is there is some general site cleanup. There is a little bit of debris everywhere. There is survey stakes left out. The tree tags need to be

removed. From there it is just whenever you guys want to do a final walkthrough for the turnover. If you guys have any other comments about that you would like him to address. Once they get their permit closed out they are just going to immediately start on the driveway. The sound barrier walls, the guy is laying brick. That is all that seems to be happening in the last couple of weeks. They are all the Way down to Lot 1 so brick is on completely except for the top and Lot 1. The column caps have been ordered for the anchor columns. He told me he was supposed to be done this week with the brick laying depending on weather. Once he was done with that then he was going to switch over to address the columns on the Tract E wall and fix those. Then they just have some of the site grading needs to get done. They have to paint the back of the wall. It looks like that is all that is pretty much though.
Mr. Kapish: I don't think the stucco is finished.
Mr. Geiger: Down by Lot 1 it was done when I was over there last time.
Mr. Kapish: Well what I am saying is I think they scratch coated it. I don't think they put the stucco on it. Usually they can't stucco it until you get all the bricks on there.
Mr. Geiger: I couldn't tell if that was stucco or not. So they still stucco on top of that scratch coat then. Alright. I'm hoping that guy is done with the brick by Friday like he said.
Mr. Kapish: That would be nice.
Mr. Morgan: Did they start the top layer?
Mr. Geiger: The last time I was out there they had not. They were just addressing the front. Main entry walls, I haven't been out that way but I don't think those transformers are in.
Mr. Baldis: February 17, that is the day FPL has scheduled for the transformers.
Mr. Geiger: Then you picked the cap color today, the copper so that was the only other thing I had on those. I heard back from Superior Concrete about the conduit that was damaged. No utility company claimed it was theirs. They said there was no service interruptions and they claimed that they repaired it before it was back filled. I sent an email to Brent after I spoke to him on the phone where he confirmed this. Then I sent him a follow-up email just to confirm this is what you said and everything. I don't think there is anything to worry about there unless a utility goes out all of the sudden. I saw

that the area was cleared around the roundabout. Survey was out there so I should have something with a new fence line for you guys over there soon.
Mr. Kapish: I think what we should do on the west side is expand the sod and open that up to see more of the lake. This bed here I think a lot of it can be made sod and we can just put something, not much landscaping.
Mr. Baldis: What do you think about just running the fence there and let it be grass? Mr. Kapish: That is fine with me too.
Mr. Baldis: It is going to be real hard to match the other side because of the electrical components. If you just run a fence there and we have a hedge and the little monument sign for the Board members in the city for the roundabout, we can kind of fix that up with some bushes and stuff.
Mr. Morgan: With all the landscaping being gone there it has really opened it up. Mr. Baldis: Oh yeah, I think it looks nice.
Mr. Morgan: Maybe if we just grass it out there it will open things up and less will be more.	Just an idea.
Mr. Baldis: I like it open myself. I like seeing the water and the fountain. The hedge is actually on the gentleman's property, we can just put our fence in front of it.
Mr. Geiger: Basically right around the property line.
Mr. Baldis: We are going to put the fence to match the fence on the other side.
Mr. Kapish: It may not be an exact match but what I am saying is you want to just block it off.
Mr. Geiger: Basically as close to the property mirroring both sides.
Mr. Baldis: Hold on, what do you mean by block it off? Do you want to block it off this way?
Mr. Kapish: You put this fence this way.
Mr. Baldis: That is what I am saying, it will come here but you will still be able to walk to the equipment.
Mr. Kapish: Unless you take a piece of the fence and move it.
Mr. Baldis: That is what I am asking because you are saying block it off and that would be the only way to block it off. Then it is definitely not going to match. They will
. still be able to walk around the other side.

Mr. Kapish: In that area too also I think we should just put sod.
Mr. Baldis: I agree. We have a camera there watching the equipement so we will just keep it neat and clean.
Mr. Geiger: We are not wrapping the fence around the corner right? Just straight to wherever that easement is. Stay out of the easement.
Mr. Kapish: Ok.
Mr. Geiger: The other thing is the Turtle Run Shoppes had been marked out, the utility easement and property line to look to where we could feasibly put a fence between the parking lot, all that landscaping and the sidewalk. Can you get out this week sometime to maybe take a look at that?
Mr. Baldis: I would like to see what we have there. I am free every day.
Mr. Geiger: Ok because that might be a situation where we can't really pick a straight line.
Mr. Baldis: We will go look at it.
Mr. Geiger: That was all on the fencing. Flagpoles, I have to set up the pre­ construction meeting still with Stanford. Between the Creekside approvals and having to jump on that, I didn't have the time last week. They should have most of the material in. I know he said the flagpoles were in stock, it is just setting up a pre-con meeting date and figuring out when he can get started on that.
Mr. Kapish: Who is handling the MPO project in the Coral Springs City Hall? Mr. Geiger: I don't know who is handling that actually.
Mr. Kapish: Who is the point person is what I am asking?
Mr. Geiger: I don't know who in the City has been dealing with it. Mr. Kapish: They have to be dealing with somebody.
Mr. Geiger: I don't know if they have submitted for permitting to the City yet. I know they submitted their 100% plans to FOOT.
Mr. Kapish: Can you find out who that is? I don't know whether it is Paul Carpenter or somebody else.
Mr. Geiger: You are just looking for who the city contact would be for that project? Mr. Kapish: Yes because if we wanted to discuss something.

Mr. Geiger: I did reach out about the bullnose on Sample. For some reason the guy in my office didn't respond to me but did let me know they submitted 100% plans so there is nothing they can do plan-wise to fix it. They are not redoing the bullnose there. It is not part of their plans. When they mill down the road there they do have to mill it properly so part of the issue might be fixed by them actually milling the road down to the correct depth.
Mr. Kapish: Unless they mill the road down about four or five inches.
Mr. Geiger: That is what they have been having to do at other places in the community where the roads were overlaid and not milled down properly. They might have to do that.
Mr. Kapish: I think what you are doing and that pavement there, it was part of work on Sample Road because when Sample Road did this, they poured or did the asphalt back in here.
Mr. Geiger: Ideally that is what they do with all the intersections when they do state roads. They go like 50 feet into the side streets and everything. I am hoping that when they mill, they mill it down to the proper depth and everything.
Mr. Kapish: I just hope they do the project right. I don't know what the big deal if you cut the D curb out and you replace it with new D curb that is a little bit higher. I don't understand what the problem is.
Mr. Geiger: I understand your point. It is just not part of the scope. They are not allowed to do that.
Mr. Kapish: Ok.
Mr. Geiger: I can find out who the city contact is that you guys can talk to. Rohl claimed the permit has been closed. It says it is closed online. They didn't ask us for as­ builts for that either so I am not sure if the City is looking for anything else as far as the streetlighting project goes.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Don't those lights get turned over to the City when they are done per the license agreement?
Mr. Kapish: That should be done and so should we hold a discussion about paying the electric bill?

Mr. Pawelczyk: Any improvements we put in the right-of-way are gifted to the City once they are completed. We have to maintain them. The COD has to maintain them.
Mr. Kapish: How do we do that process as far as the electric goes?
Mr. Pawelczyk: The electric I don't know, you have to have a conversation with whoever can make a decision over there.
Mr. Kapish: Rich Michaud?
Mr. Pawelczyk: You can probably start with Rich I guess.
Mr. Baldis: I will talk to Rich because we either have to estimate we are paying or they are going to have to put a meter on for them.
Mr. Kapish: Or just pay the same as they have been paying. Mr. Baldis: I can ask.
Mr. Kapish: I don't know, I am just guessing.
Mr. Baldis: It is very hard for us because the irrigation pump and the fountain, all that is connected. Let me just talk to them.
Mr. Kapish: The City manager even said part of the rate that they pay not just covers your electric but it also covers maintenance and stuff. If we are going to do the maintenance, that part needs to come to us.
Mr. Baldis: Right, I will talk to them tomorrow.
Mr. Pawelczyk: I am sure that we can come up with a creative way that all parties can agree on how to pay it even if you do a, once it is metered. Do a trial for two years, see what it is and revisit it if you have to.
Mr. Kapish: Ok.
Mr. Geiger: That was all for the streetlighting. If Rohl comes back and they need more information, obviously we will help them get the permit but the permit says closed online. I am assuming the project should be finished now. They were out installing I believe they finished installing the signs on Turtle Run Boulevard Central.
Mr. Baldis: That is my understanding.
Mr. Geiger: I have to get out there and inspect it but there was only a couple signs that were installed that they had to move.
Mr. Kapish: I only saw like two or three of the designer concrete poles.

Mr. Geiger: That sounds about right. All the crosswalk signs had to go on normal posts. There was .only a couple of signs that needed to be installed on the decorative posts.
Mr. Kapish: All the signs are going to be decorative.
Mr. Geiger: Yes but I need to get the permit. This was just to get the Turtle Run Boulevard Central Broward Traffic engineering plans closed when Stanford did that in 2017.
Mr. Kapish: Mainnor ordered the poles for the Estates and he ordered the Parks. Mr. Baldis: Let's finish with - you done with yours on this section?
Mr. Geiger: I just have to get back out there and inspect what Horse Power installed.
Mr. Baldis: You need to confirm that it was done.
Mr. Geiger: Yes and then I can close the Turtle Run Boulevard Central permit out with Broward County Traffic and we can move on to getting the other signs.
Mr. Kapish: Whoever installed those poles, I will say this they left the ground a mess. There is dirt all over and ruts from the truck or whatever.
Mr. Baldis: We will inspect it tomorrow and get it squared away.
Mr. Geiger: If they left the site a  mess I can contact them.	That is all the active construction stuff we have right now. Did you have questions about other signage?
Mr. Kapish: Let me ask you this, on Tortoise Way diagram plans, how is that coming?
Mr. Geiger:	I am finishing them up. Again because of Creekside and all the revisions I had to make and everything, that is what I was doing last week. They are a little bit further than they were last week and I should be getting close to finish with those.
Mr. Baldis: The plans to raise the wall, the six feet FPL and Turtle Creek Drive you guys were going to make plans to do that. Is that in the process?
Mr. Geiger: I have not even started that yet. I believe when we spoke you said it wasn't the top priority.
Mr. Baldis: Just a reminder.
Mr. Geiger: It is on my list. I have to get with our structural guy.

those?

Mr.  Baldis: What  about  the monument  sign easements,  where  are we at  with

Mr. Geiger: The attorney they were using was out of town.  They are in contact

now and I believe we sent the check over. They should be running.
Mr. Baldis: Sent a check to who?
Mr. Geiger: The attorney that we used for the title search. Mr. Baldis: I got you. Ok.
Mr. Geiger: Either this week I should be hearing back. Cristin and Tamara Peacock we are pushing just to submit to DRC as soon as we can instead of waiting on that. We will just have to revise the survey if we have an easement and if not, we will have to get the easement or revise the survey.
Mr. Kapish:  How many are in question?
Mr. Geiger: All of them. All the remaining locations. The only one that I am unsure about is Wendy's because we didn't have a document showing anything.
Mr. Kapish: I know they are doing all of them, that is what I am saying, the only thing that is in question is the Wendy's one.
Mr. Geiger: That is the only one that we didn't have anything that showed an easement at one point on it but safely I could argue that since there was an easement on every other one done, at some point there is probably one at the Wendy's property as well. We will know. The title search company, we basically told them for Turtle Run stuff now to go back to 1986 for this and not the standard 20 years because we do need to capture everything. The Lots 55 - 58 wall I am working with our structural to revise the column details with the anchor columns so we don't run into the same issue on that wall. After that Bob is working on the bid advertisement package with my coworker Gigi so we should have something hopefully here.
Mr. Kapish: Put is out as soon as possible.
Mr. Geiger: Yes. That shouldn't be a problem. Forest Glen, Bob finalized his report and everything. I believe he made the revisions that Mike had suggested and everything.
Mr. Pawelczyk: He asked me to review it. I didn't review the content but the way it sounds.

Mr. Geiger: I don't know if anybody else had any comments. He said he finished it up and everything. Did he send you a copy?
Mr. Kapish: Yes but I am getting copies of stuff - I can't even open them up on my phone, it is too big.
,Mr. Carney: What is the latest on the Forest Glen project?
Mr. Geiger: We put together a letter that outlines the efforts we have made over the last two years.
Ms. Karnegis: It was a good letter.
Mr. Geiger: It is a big package and everything.
Mr. Pawelczyk: You should take that report that Bob did revise. I know he sent it to Zaida and distribute it to the oard so you guys can take a look at it before the next meeting.
Mr. Geiger: We have a copy here. It is all stuff you guys have seen and heard before.
Mr. Pawelczyk: I am just saying so you can send it to the Board ahead of time before the next meeting so if they want to look at it they can. That is all.
Mr. Geiger: When Bob has it finalized I will send it to Dennis and ask him to distribute it to everyone. The only other project in design right now is the secondary entry walls and like I said we are getting those done, waiting on the easement information. Then it is just going to be back for the DRC process. I am waiting on landscape to finish their plans too for those. Najla is helping me with the easement dedication at the park for the increased sign. She'll take a look at that this week. She basically just needs to check to make sure the new parks people have no problem with it. Rick Engle had no problem with it but now he is gone. Now she just needs to double check.
Mr. Kapish: Rick Engle didn't have a problem with, and our conversation today was even more positive. I talked to the City Manager today and he was even real positive about some of the stuff.
Mr. Geiger: From our prospective once Najla is ok with it, I just have to send her the sign ad survey. All the paperwork is all on their end since they are the owner of the property and everything. She did ask us to contact FPL though and make sure with their two easements there and some of their equipment that there is no issues but I don't think

there is an issue at all I am going to send them an email tomorrow just to get something in writing. I don't think I have anything else. I did notice I sent you and Dennis an email on this. There was some flooding at the Passive Park lake path.
Mr. Kapish: We have had a lot of rain. Usually it dries up within a few days.
Mr. Geiger: The water looked like it was sitting there because all the bricks were getting kind of mucky. Ideally the solution to this would just be to cut the grass down a little bit, take that berm down a little bit to let it drain. Unfortunately this is the low part - it was designed to be low there. The idea was to flow the water into the canal but I guess when the grass got put back and the site got built up.
Mr. Baldis: We talked about that. We are going to cut the grass.
Mr. Geiger: That was the only other thing I had then. That is it. I took a look at the dip at Turtle Run Boulevard and Sample. We did go out and look at that. It is very small and localized. There is not a lot of cracking around that dip so I am not sure what the issue is there.
Mr. Kapish: I noticed when you drive out that way it started out as a small pothole but it is deeper now and it is bigger.
Mr. Geiger: It is very localized though.
Mr. Kapish: Maybe talk to Stanford and ask him about that because I don't know if there is a pipe underneath the ground. Getting all these problems with these pavers at the main entrance and stuff I don't know if there is any issues underneath the ground. think it is worth investigating it. It could be a sinkhole, I have no idea.
Mr. Geiger: It is hard to tell without opening the road up. Mr. Baldis: There is a sleeve that was installed there.
Mr. Kapish: Was it in that place?
Mr. Baldis: Yes. We talked about this Jonathan. There was an email and I said yes, there is a sleeve that we put in, in case it needs to be done.
Mr. Kapish: The road is sinking because the sleeve was never jack and bore.
Mr. Baldis: If you go in the grass you will see there is a sleeve, I had them put a cap on it and a box so that we could find if we ever needed it.
Mr. Kapish: So maybe see if Stanford can fix that.
Mr. Geiger: Do you want them to mill and resurface that small area there?

Mr. Kapish: I think the hole has to be filled in or something.
Mr. Geiger: That is what they will do. Are we talking a fix to make the road flat or a fix if it is sinking because there is something leaking?
Mr. Kapish: I think once you open it up you will find that out.
Mr. Geiger: Ok that is what I am getting at. Milling and resurfacing is going to be much different than if they have to trench the road.
Mr. Baldis: Have Stanford look at it and get his opinion. We can talk about 15 different solutions he needs to look at it first.
Mr. Kapish: Is that it Jonathan? Mr. Geiger: Yes.
Mr. Baldis: No. We wanted to talk about, you guys went on and identified the brick pavers there. The amount of brick pavers because the Board wants to find out - they want to purchase the pavers here and they want to find out what it would cost to remove those. We need to get a couple of prices to remove and install brick pavers. The District will supply them. You sent me an email showing me the quantity of brick because your survey guys were out there. The existing pavers that are not damaged, they can be sold, correct?
Mr. Geiger: I have no idea if you can resell those or who would take them.
Mr. Pawelczyk: You would have to declare them a surplus property and then you would have to put a bid, that is the only way to get rid of them unless you give them to a non-profit or another government entity.
Mr. Geiger: I am assuming a contractor is just going to get in there and remove those not very cautiously because they are not expecting to save them.
Mr. Baldis: You have done that survey right? You have identified the quantity of brick. Do we need to have a plan drawn up how we want that? How do we go about hiring a contractor to install that in the herringbone pattern? Is that something the specifications, is that something you guys can do and then we provide the agreement?
Mr. Geiger: I think with the pattern of the brick really you just tell them what you want. That is all we have been doing.
Mr. Kapish: So we buy the pavers and then we contract a paver guy and he puts them down.

Mr. Geiger: My next question would be, is this a permit thing or is this considered maintenance because the pavers are there?
Mr. Baldis: I am not sure how they are going to approach that.
Mr. Geiger: If you are replacing the pavers too, then it is in the right-of-way all of the sudden.
Mr. Baldis: I can get a price on the pavers and then we tell them how many square feet and show them the job. Am I going to solicit a proposal from US Brick also or are they out of the question?
Mr. Kapish: They are already holding...
Mr. Baldis: That is where I am going because we sent a letter asking them for our money back. That letter was sent last week regular mail and certified. I am looking also, have we been happy with what they have done recently?
Mr. Kapish: Not recently. Do we have to or give them an option?
Mr. Baldis: We don't have to give them. You and I spent a lot of time out there with Life many days meeting him and just got the run around forever. I don't think they have been the best vendor we have had. They used to be but I am talking recently. I can solicit other guys. There is a lot of guys who put down pavers.
Mr. Kapish: I would get at least three.
Mr. Baldis: I will get three. I would like to get our money back that we have asked for. I will go about my business and then say, no, we decided not to get a proposal from you. I just want to make sure. Ok.
Mr. Kapish: Does everybody agree? Ms. Karnegis: Yes.
Mr. Baldis: Ok thank you.
Mr. Geiger: You could probably talk to Stanford on that too. The guys he used did a good job.
Mr. Baldis: There is lots of people. I will get three prices. Mr. Kapish: Anybody have any questions for Jonathan?
Mr. Carney: No thank you.

SEVENTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Resolution
#2020-01 Classifying Certain Tangible Property of the District as  Surplus and Authorizing the District Manager to Sell or Dispose of Said Equipment
Mr. Baldis: That is the old benches and trash receptacles. Chris has the resolution there. That is all it is.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Just for clarification Chris mentioned sell, it is really dispose of which allows us to donate it to a non-profit or another local government entity. It is my understanding that there is a non-profit that wants to take these so that is good.
Mr. Baldis: It is being donated.

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Ms. Karnegis with all in favor Resolution #2020-01 classifying certain tangible property of the District as Surplus and authorizing the District Manager to Dispose of said equipment was approved.

EIGHTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Proposal
from Light Works for Turtle Run Estates Street Signs
Mr. Kapish: I am assuming this is the main entrance?
Mr. Baldis: No it is for the Estates to purchase the Estates signs to go inside all the streets in the Estates.
Mr. Kapish: Oh ok.
Mr. Baldis: Remember you and I talked to Mainnor on the phone. For all the signs to replace them in the Estates to the upgraded concrete that would match Turtle Run Boulevard is $56,160. That does not include installation, it is just the purchase of the signs.
Mr. Carney: What is price per sign?
Mr. Baldis: I believe there is 30 signs and they are different prices.

Mr. Geiger: Some of them are bigger poles. Mr. Baldis: I got two prices for the installation.
Mr. Pawelczyk: Is it 30 or it says 26 street sign poles. Mr. Geiger: It is 26.
Mr. Baldis: Horse Power has been putting them in for us. He sent me a price. Again I looked at it and thought I feel like he's killing me. I went and asked to get another one. Horse Power gave me a price to install the signs for $36,270. I got a price from Anzco for $11,700. Jonathan and I had a few conversations and Anzco is capable of digging holes and putting signs in concrete just as well as Horse Power can. They are kind of an electrical company and I would rather save the money. It is a huge difference. I am confident that he can do it. The only issue and I have talked to Mainnor about it is that they have some other poles there that they have been holding and I asked Mainnor if he was charging us for space to rent them and he said no. We used him to finish out the Turtle Run Boulevard job. I am kind of like not using him with his prices. It is like $1,400 a sign or something like that to drill a hole and throw a bag of cement in there.
Mr. Carney: Is there an actual spec for an installation?
Mr. Baldis: He was provided the same information, it was apples to apples. Mr. Kapish: Do they have be inspected by the City?
Mr. Geiger: The new ones, yes.
Mr. Kapish: That is what I am saying.
Mr. Geiger: These are direct burial poles, these don't get concrete so I am not sure what the City actually inspects on these.
Mr. Kapish: They dig the hole and they pour concrete. Mr. Baldis: The answer is they are going to inspect it.
Mr. Geiger: These aren't concrete, these are direct burial poles. Mr. Kapish: Are you sure about that?
Mr. Baldis: I guess because of the size.
Mr. Geiger: They get imbedded six foot into the ground.
Mr. Kapish: The poles that we had that were done years ago, some of them were in the sidewalk and they tore the flag out.

Mr. Geiger: It goes six foot into the ground now. Those were shallower before that is why you had the concrete. When I spoke with Mainnor and he gave me the wind load calcs and everything I made sure to ask him. He said they are direct burial, no concrete. Some of the poles are up to like 14 foot. Half the pole is underground pretty much.
Mr. Carney: That is definitely different.
Mr. Geiger: It is just to Florida building code, the 171 mph 3 second wind gusts. Mr. Kapish: Where does Horse Power get$ 36,000 if it is a direct burial?
Mr. Carney: They are an electrical company though. Mr. Baldis: Correct.
Mr. Ca'rney: They don't have to do this.
Mr. Geiger: Does some of that include the storage of material? Mr. Baldis: No I checked.
Mr. Kapish: So the ones they just put in are those direct burial? Mr. Geiger: Yes, same poles.
Mr. Morgan: Where are all these signs going in? Mr. Kapish: The Estates.
Mr. Baldis: They are replacing all the street signs in the Estates.
Mr. Geiger: It is just the internal signs. The stop signs and the ones near Turtle Run Boulevard, those are part of the other plans.

On MOTION by Ms. Karnegis seconded by Mr. Carney with all in favor accepting the proposal from Light Works in the amount of $56,160 for Turtle Run Estates Street signs was approved.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
A. Attorney
Mr. Kapish: Do you have anything Mike?

Staff Reports

Mr. Pawelczyk:	Nothing that we haven't talked about no, unless the Board has any questions.
Mr. Baldis: Just to give you a heads up, we did have a meeting with the Parks Director and he is going to talk to the attorneys about how to move forward so you may

get a call from him. It is a new guy from the Parks and he wants to make sure that everybody legally knows that.
Mr. Kapish: The partnership agreement, I guess they actually want a document, liabilities and all that. They want to talk about it.
Mr. Pawelczyk: It is already in the agreement. The only thing that is not in the agreement is if we add stuff. So what is in the agreement now really deals with the rails or the fence posts and our maintenance of the areas we are responsible for. The Adopt­ a-Park agreement does allow for us to add to that.
Mr. Baldis: Irrigation and stuff. Mr. Kapish: He is not clear with it.
Mr. Pawelczyk: He will probably talk with Sherry or the other in there. Mr. Carney: Is the City going to divvy up anything?
Mr. Baldis: We started out the conversation with what are your plans for Turtle Run Park. Where is Turtle Run Park with the rotation with you replacing the equipment and it is a year to two years that Turtle Run is scheduled to get all new playground equipment. Their budget is $80,000 to do that. We told them that we do want them to participate in that. We had that conversation prior to showing them the plans and we also asked them about if they purchase so much playground equipment maybe they can get better than we can. They can look into getting grant money. They have a person who works on grants just for that. We said we are probably going to pony up more than you are but you guys need to help with this type of stuff. He had no problems. He didn't give any indication that he wouldn't give the money they allotted for the new playground equipment there which would be $80,000. We didn't talk any details about equipment. We talked about moving things in different areas to make the Park more functional kind of like an initial conversation to get the feel for everybody where they are at. They were very receptive to the idea.
Mr. Kapish: I think p'robably what we are going to need to do is at one of the upcoming meetings bring the boards back of the plans for the park. We need to finalize those plans and say this is what we want because it is going to be a lot easier to go back to them and say this is our plan. This is what we want. This is what it is costing us and it is going to be better to have that discussion about money when we have an actual plan.

Right now what we brought to them was the concept which was developed by Tamara Peacock and the playground guy. We don't really have an actual plan - this is what we finalized and that is what we need to do. We can think about it and bring your thoughts and stuff and in the next couple meetings we will work on that. I did speak to the City Manager and had a separate meeting with him today after that meeting and he was very receptive and I liked his tone and everything about stuff. He even asked when our meetings were and he would like to come to one of our meetings which was the first City Manager to ever ask to do that. We talked about the park specifically for a good while. He even said that he is going to reexamine the fence issue. He says he is going to find out if the 25 feet going back whether that is really true that they can't do it or not. If they can move it ten feet, he says they will move it ten feet. It is opening a discussion.
Mr. Carney: They will or will they allow us to?
Mr. Kapish: I think they will allow us. I don't even know why you need fence there to be honest with you.
Mr. Baldis: Another part of that conversation was the infield and if the infield was grass that you could have move room for the soccer fields because there would be a grass infield. The base path would be dirt or a brown color artificial turf.
Mr. Kapish: What was discussed also is that even if you redo the field and the field when you redo it you really have to level it. They all know that the problem exists.
Mr. Carney: The drainage is terrible.
Mr. Kapish: They know the field the crooked. What I was told was it was probably going to cost them a $100,000 to relevel and sod the field. Now I also brought up the idea of putting turf on the field for multi-purpose so that the infield and the guy from Louisiana, one of the Assistant Directors, he was very familiar with that. He says that they have a lot of the schools and parks and stuff have a lot of that. Where he came from it made more sense and actually in the long run you didn't have to water and cut and all that kind of stuff. You don't have that maintenance. There is maintenance to it but it won't be to the extent of that so that is a savings. I would like to open that conversation up a little further and see how far we can go with it. Then definitely you could move the fence back and create more space. The City Manager was open to that. Again it all involved discussion but it was a yes thing to do things. It wasn't a no. He actually even

said that when you say yes, he says the reason why a lot of people don't say yes is because it involved follow up. I felt very good about it. We can have the Park that you want. In fact, there has been some comments from people I know that there is a lot with all of our projects going on, one of the comments from somebody was when is the facelift coming to the Park. Of course we are working on that. We don't have anything to answer that with but we are obviously working on it.
Mr. Carney: I just hope that we don't make it so nice that our taxpayers can't get near it.
Mr. Kapish: That is part of the discussion is that if we are going to dump a lot of money into it, we have to have a little bit of say so. I think they were under the impression the City Manager was and I told him this wasn't true but he was under the impression I guess you know how rumors go through staff that we were going to once we got the improvements through, we were going to lock up the Park only for ourselves. Now you can't because it is a City Park. You can't do that but it doesn't mean that you can't have restrictions on certain parts of the Park. Maybe have the ballfield locked up only for usage of certain games. You can't just have everybody walk into the field especially when you have turf like that. I talked to him about the problem with the destruction of the equipment is from the school kids. Basically they are standing on it, occupying it and there is people trying to use the equipment with their kid and the kid can't even get on with somebody telling them to get off the equipment. That has been a problem. I told him that was a problem. That will have to be addressed. A detail person working, they need to go over there and say get off the equipment.
Mr. Baldis: As far as that goes, I think the issue is having that as a drop off for the school. They drop them off and they go there and hang out until the last second and then goes in. They are using the Park as a school drop off because they never addressed the real issue out there.
Mr. Kapish: The play area won't be anywhere near the parking lot. That all goes into the thought of design is to make things not convenient. It is convenient to sit in the playground when the parking lot is 20 feet away. It will be a little different when it is 500 feet away. I don't know that people are going to want to sit on the play gyms and then

have to walk to the parking lot 500 feet away. There are a lot of things to consider about the details. Anything else regarding that?
Mr. Carney: That is all thank you.

8.	Engineer
1)	Approval of Change Order #9 with Rohl Global Network LP for Streetlighting project
Mr. Geiger: Change order #9 for Rohl is just for the storage fees from January 2019 until September 2019. Basically it was just the rate to store the poles for the extra time they were being stored under the FPL easement. $9,840 is what they are asking for. It was $1,230 a month basically is what they are claiming.
Mr. Baldis: They are charging us to store poles on our property? Mr. Geiger: That is what it says. Storage streetlights.
Mr. Baldis: I can see us being responsible for the fencing that went up that I chained closed but other than that, why would they charge us to have stuff on our property. If they can produce that the fence cost $9,000.
Mr. Geiger: You are right. It seems like a lot. Fencing is not $1,200 a month.
Mr. Kapish: I can understand us paying for the fencing but to have them just laying on our property. It is District property.
Mr. Baldis: Just ask them.
Mr. Geiger: To provide justification. If they give us a receipt that says it was $9,000 for the fence.
Mr. Baldis: We just put the temporary fence over on 43rd and that was $1,200. Mr. Geiger: That is crazy.
Mr. Baldis: Just ask them.

2)	Approval of Change Order #2 with Stanford Construction Co. for Demolition and Re-pouring of Damaged P-Top Inlet for the Creekside Drive ROW Improvements Project

3)	Approval of Change Order #2R with Stanford Construction Co. for Demolition of Pre-Fabricated Installation of P-Top Inlet for the Creekside Drive ROW Improvements Project
1)	
Mr. Geiger: We have change order #2 and #2R from Stanford. These are for the P-Top Inlets, the curb inlets that were damaged or the one that was damaged. Originally, I had come to you guys with a price for them to demo, form and re-pour and that was
$4,600. You guys asked us to check a price on a prefab structure. All said and done the prefab structure along cost $4,085 so factoring in the demo, overhead and profit to get a prefab one and then install it, it would be $6,422.75. For them to demo, form and just pour it, it would be $4,600 even.
Mr. Kapish: Can you show us where this is at on the map? Mr. Geiger: I believe it is this one over here.
Mr. Kapish: Ok, so you just need a motion for that?
Mr. Geiger: I am assuming you guys are probably going to want do the cheaper of the two here right?
Mr. Kapish: Yes.
Mr. Baldis: What was that? Mr. Geiger: $4,600 even.
Mr. Kapish: Anybody have any questions about it? Do you have a picture of it?
Mr. Geiger: I do. That is what it used to look like and I have a very blurry picture  of it with both the cracks in it. I had to zoom on one of my background photos. There. was the one chunk. You can see the rebar to. You can see it coming out. I checked the other P-Tops too. Some of them, there was a little bit of cracking on some of them but this was by far the one that I think if you were going to replace any of them, it would be this one.
Mr. Kapish: Ok we need a motion to replace that drainage cap.
Mr. Pawelczyk: I think it is a motion to approve Change Order #2 with Stanford on the Creekside Drive Right-of Way projects for a demo of a p-top and form and pour new p-top for $4,600.

On MOTION by Ms. Karnegis seconded by Mr. Carney with all in favor accepting Change Order #2 with Stanford Construction Co for Demolition and Re-pouring of Damaged P-Top Inlet for the Creekside Drive Right-of-Way improvements in the amount of $4,600 was approved.

C.	Field Manager
D.	Manager
Mr. Baldis: I talked to BrightView regarding the irrigation at the main entrance. They reduced their price to $12,561.73. BP's price was at $10,305.78 so BrightView dropped their price from $15,561 down to $12,561. That is the lowest they told me they could go.
Mr. Kapish: That is at the main entrance?
Mr. Baldis: Correct. The talk was at the last meeting that the Board thought that it was better to have BrightView do it because they are our contractor and that is why I went back to them for the second time.
Mr. Carney: All the work they get they don't seem to give you the best price right out of the chute. That is a concern. I understand that they are here and they are doing the work but the only time they lower their price is when you go out and get another quote. That is a topic for discussion.
Mr. Kapish: This was the main entrance. Wasn't there another price for the Passive Park?
Mr. Baldis: I am just addressing the front entrance right now.
Mr. Kapish: All the connections and stuff - the plan is apples and apples. Mr. Baldis: Yes. BP Sprinkler was given the plan that BrightView designed.
Mr. Carney: Maybe they need to lose one once in a while and they will give us a better price next time around.
Mr. Kapish: I don't have a problem using BP.
Mr. Carney: That way every time Dennis goes out and gets another quote, we give these guys some work once in a while instead of just getting quotes and quotes.
Mr. Kapish: The other companies probably figure you are getting quotes just to get BrightView down.
Mr. Baldis: That is a concern for me.
Mr. Carney: We do this a lot. We go out and get a quote and then they lower their price and we give them job.
Mr. Kapish: What do you guys think?
Mr. Carney: I say we go with the $10,000 quote. Ms. Karnegis: I agree.

Mr. Morgan: Make a motion.

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Morgan with all in favor accepting the proposal from BP Sprinkler in the amount of $10,305.78 for irrigation at the main entrance was approved.

Mr. Baldis: On Terrapin Lane the homeowner that has the fence on District property that was disputing it, he went to the City and talked to the Chief Building Inspector who I ended up speaking to, he had a survey saying that it was on his property. Jonathan and I looked at it. I sent one, I hand delivered to the gentleman over at the City. He looked at it. I called him today and said, did you have a chance to look at it? He said yes and that I talked to Mr. Weiss over there and told him that your fence is on their property. I called him up today and said you know I understand you talked to the chief guy at the city and he agreed that is on there. Yes, I am talking to my fence people to get it moved. I said alright, I appreciate that. I said just keep me updated of how you are making out with the fence guy. I didn't want to give him an ultimatum at this point. He said he is going to have it taken off. I said fine I appreciate it. Trying to keep the peace there. The other item that I wanted to talk to you from the last meeting was the FPL easement and the large mango. The Board wanted to think about that. I don't know if everyone had time to do that or not. If you need more time that is fine, I am just looking for direction.
Mr. Kapish: I think everyone should go out and look at it. If they have questions about it go out and look at it. I have but I don't know if you guys have.
Ms. Karnegis: No I have not.
Mr. Kapish: I think you need to walk out there and look at it really to get a scope of what the issue is. The issue really isn't the 22 feet or whatever footage it is. The issue boils down to this. We are doing a construction project and that item is in the way of the construction project. Now when we put walls in, we took out when we put this wall in back here, we took out bald cypress trees, huge bald cypress trees because it was in the way. We didn't put the wall around it. We put the wall straight. That is really the issue and that is the only part of the issue. It is directly in the way so I think if you go there Zaida you will see that the tree and both the fences go right up to it. It is in the middle. Not that we

have to do this, but it would be an act of good will. If they want us to purchase a small mango tree for them and put it someplace else, then take the tree out so we can finish our construction.
Mr. Carney: I need to go out and take a look at it.
Mr. Kapish: We will take it up next meeting. Dennis do you have anything else? Mr. Baldis: That is all I have. Thank you.
Mr. Kapish: Anybody have anything for Dennis? Mr. Carney: No thank you.

TENTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor Requests
Mr. Kapish: Supervisors Requests. Skip do you have anything? Mr. Carney: All good thank you.
Ms. Karnegis: Nothing here. Mr. Kapish: Lance?
Mr. Morgan: I did look at the mango tree. It is a monstrous tree. When you stand back from our new brick paver walkway you will see that it is a big tree. I think it is one of those things that it looks nice but when it is gone, they will say, oh my God, look how much it opened it up. They can always replant. In my opinion I would say we should take the tree down. Go out and look at it.
Mr. Kapish: Anything else? Mr. Morgan: No that is it.
Mr. Kapish: Dennis you are taking care of that flooding over there on the Passive Park thing, right?
Mr. Baldis: Yes.
Mr. Kapish: Ok. I don't have anything else. Oh I do have a question. The order for the street signs will take how many weeks?
Mr. Baldis: I said eight weeks.
Mr. Kapish: That puts us into April. Mr. Baldis: Yes.
Mr. Kapish: Why don't we get them installed by Turtle Run Day? Mr. Baldis: We can try. I will call Mainnor tomorrow.

Mr. Morgan: When is Turtle Run Day this year? Mr. Kapish: The 27th .
Mr. Morgan: April 27.
Mr. Pawelczyk: We can get a proposal for the contractor too and bring back an agreement beforehand.
Mr. Baldis: I have that. Mr. Pawelczyk: Ok.
Mr. Kapish: I don't have anything else. We just need a motion to adjourn the meeting.

ELEVENTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Morgan seconded by Ms. Karnegis with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.